Ciaran McCreesh posted on Tue, 17 May 2016 12:29:36 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 07:26:03 -0400 Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
>> We already have "emerge --config" which is expected to be run after the
>> install process has completed, so I don't think that this is too much
>> of a stretc
I'm no longer willing to maintain sys-boot/gummiboot and this makes it
maintainer-needed. The package is no longer maintained upstream,
and has been merged into systemd. It seems that there are still people
using it without systemd though, so I'm not going to lastrite it
myself, and prefer getting
On Wednesday 18 of May 2016 09:22:53 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016 18:06:44 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > General advise: do not convert ebuilds inheriting cmake-utils to EAPI 6
> > unless you know what you are doing (you are fully aware of eclass
> > behaviour r
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
look to the caller editing happens in place.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff
aide...@gentoo.org:
> From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
>
> awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
> desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
> look to the caller editing happens in place.
> ---
> eclass/eutils.eclass | 13 +
> 1 f
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
It is an eclass providing functions to build Erlang/OTP projects using
dev-util/rebar. All packages in upcoming category dev-erlang are going
to use this eclass.
---
eclass/rebar.eclass | 220
1 file changed, 220 inser
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:25:02PM +0100, aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
>
> awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
> desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
> look to the caller editing happens in place.
NAK.
1
Göktürk Yüksek writes:
>> +cat "${f}" >"${tmpf}" || return 1
> Why shell redirection with cat instead of cp? both are in coreutils.
I thought cp could overwrite file mode of already existing tmp file, but
actually it doesn't, so cp can be here as well. Is there actual benefit
of using cp here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Amadeusz Żołnowski:
> Göktürk Yüksek writes:
>>> + cat "${f}" >"${tmpf}" || return 1
>> Why shell redirection with cat instead of cp? both are in
>> coreutils.
>
> I thought cp could overwrite file mode of already existing tmp
> file, but actuall
Cool!
aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> +_find_dep_version() {
> + local pn="$1"
> + local p
> +
> + pushd "${EPREFIX}$(get_erl_libs)" >/dev/null
> + for p in ${pn} ${pn}-*; do
> + if [[ -d ${p} ]]; then
> + echo "${p#${pn}-}"
> + retur
On Wed, 18 May 2016 19:31:38 -0400
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> There could be some performance implications. cat will usually do
> slow, buffered I/O. cp tries to be smarter with allocation, i.e. it
> may take advantage of the btrfs specific clone to do a O(1) copy.
Really? We're talking about editi
Jeroen Roovers:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016 19:31:38 -0400
> Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
>
>> There could be some performance implications. cat will usually do
>> slow, buffered I/O. cp tries to be smarter with allocation, i.e. it
>> may take advantage of the btrfs specific clone to do a O(1) copy.
>
> Real
On Wed, 18 May 2016 23:35:18 +0100
aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
>
> It is an eclass providing functions to build Erlang/OTP projects using
> dev-util/rebar. All packages in upcoming category dev-erlang are going
> to use this eclass.
> ---
> eclass/rebar.eclass | 220
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
