To follow is a series of patches to enable EAPI 6 support in cmake-utils.eclass
and some other general cleanups.
Michael Palimaka (14):
cmake-utils.eclass: reorder a bit
cmake-utils.eclass: declare some variables local
cmake-utils.eclass: use a proper if statement
cmake-utils.eclass: remov
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index fd53b3a..cc4c06b 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -112,6 +112,15 @@ CMAKE_REMOVE_
Prevents them from spanning multilibs.
Gentoo-bug: 513170
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index cc4c06b..f361bc7 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-ut
From: Nikoli
Gentoo-bug: 544966
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index f361bc7..fb80b13 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -219,7 +219
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index b2e13a1..28caed2 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ _CMAKE_UTILS_ECLASS=1
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Do we wan
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index fb80b13..b2e13a1 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -428,12 +428,12 @@ enable_cmake-utils_src_pre
It is basically unused across the tree and complicates the eclass. If it were
needed, it might be better to write custom ebuild phase functions instead.
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 1de863f..e8b24bd 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ _generator_to
This is the correct phase for source modifications, and additionally avoids a
multilib race condition.
Gentoo-bug: 513170
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 44 +++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/ec
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 66 +++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index e8b24bd..df33fd9 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 22c8718..e6d77ef 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -583,7 +583,11 @@ enable_cmake-utils_src_con
This will allow us to remove the capitalisation variants code later.
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 51da1c0..960b34b 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index e6d77ef..51da1c0 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -438,13 +438,16 @@ enable_cmake-u
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6ff6dedb44fff4289764dc5eb960e1c6
Gentoo-bug: 514384
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 960b34b..507d27d 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 70b70e2..9e8e71e 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Founda
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
index 507d27d..70b70e2 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ _CMAKE_UTILS_ECLASS=1
# Should
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> After what feels like ages, we're just about ready to stabilize
> apache-2.4. Since this is a major upgrade that in many cases require
> configuration changes, we wanted to do a news item. After some
> discussion with Lars (Poly-C), here's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/18/2016 09:44 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them,
> I started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
> finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I
>
On 17 Jan 2016 21:03, Michał Górny wrote:
> net-fs/autofs: dlan@
> net-fs/curlftpfs : slyfox@
> net-fs/davfs2: proxy-maintainers, gokt...@binghamton.edu
> net-fs/libnfs:
> net-fs/ncpfs :
> net-fs/netatalk :
On 17 Jan 2016 21:57, Lars Wendler wrote:
> I am going to take the following packages:
>
> net-dialup/mingetty
> net-dialup/ppp
> net-dialup/rp-pppoe
>
> I think that I might not be the perfect maintainer for these packages
> (especially for ppp) so if anyone else wants to maintain these, feel
>
On 18 Jan 2016 10:38, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:47:54 +0100 Michał Górny wrote:
> > media-tv/kodi:
> > media-tv/xbmc:
>
> you can add video herd for these two if vapier is ok with that i think
sounds fine
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Di
On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to
> > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding
> > it and looking for new maintainer
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > sys-apps/kexec-tools :
>>
>> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
>>
>> > sys-fs/jfsutils :
>>
>> Definitely base-system, as x
On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools :
> >>
> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe?
> >>
> >> > sys-fs/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
There are now 10 attendees. Are there other candidates?
If yes, please suscribe at [1], because I will contact the restaurant
friday.
Kind regards,
Xavier Miller.
Le 13/01/16 10:19, Xavier Miller a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> The FOSDEM 2016 is very so
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
> -mike
Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here is part
of getting rid of herds. =:^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>> -mike
>
> Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here i
On 20 Jan 2016 19:48, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted:
> > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd
>
> Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here is part
> of getting rid of herds. =:^)
a
28 matches
Mail list logo