On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:47:54 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> media-tv/kodi:
> media-tv/xbmc:
you can add video herd for these two if vapier is ok with that i think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/17/2016 10:18 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Second attempt!
>
> ===
>
> Title: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4 Author: Dirkjan Ochtman
> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2016-01-17
> Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed:
>
On 2016-01-17 19:18, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Second attempt!
>
> ===
>
> Title: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4
> Author: Dirkjan Ochtman
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2016-01-17
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache
>
> With the 2.4 branch re
Michał Górny writes:
> Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers:
> [...]
>
> net-im/ejabberd :
I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take ejabberd
if noone else wants. Co-maintainers are welcome.
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Descript
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I
started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition
finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I was
wondering what the community thinks about them
NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different
> than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit
> policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package.
> This obviously
