On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
>
> the general list looks pretty good:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984
IMO these should be fixed before we unmask:
546742: x11-apps/sessreg-1.1.0 fail t
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Proposal 3a might be: Anytime an RDEPEND in an eclass is changed, the
>> eclass must be revisioned unless all ebuilds in the gentoo repository
>> will continue to work correctly with the old RDEPEND.
>> Proposal 4a mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore.
>
> Please stand up or try to remove tcltk support from your packages.
>
> Justin
>
I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an
Dnia 2015-10-02, o godz. 03:38:16
Daniel Campbell napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore.
> >
> > Please stand up or try to remove tcltk support from yo
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:42:37 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an idle curiosity
> > of mine. Are there any particularly important packages that run on
> > them?
>
> dev-tcltk/expect is sometimes used for modem chats.
>
> net-im/tkabber used to be
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-10-02, o godz. 03:38:16
> Daniel Campbell napisał(a):
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 09/30/2015 06:02 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore.
>>>
>>> Please stand up or try to re
Daniel Campbell napisał(a):
> I know next to nothing about tcl/tk but it's been an idle curiosity.
> Are there any particularly important packages that run on them?
All my pkgs which requre it have USE flag 'tk' set (compare Dale's list).
I have it set in make.conf for whatever reason (somethin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/10/15 03:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:11:22 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand
> wrote:
>> On 10/01/2015 09:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:08:00 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
>>> wrote:
Slotmove VDB up
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
>>
>> the general list looks pretty good:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984
>
> IMO these should be fixe
On 02 Oct 2015 02:21, Ryan Hill wrote:
> IMO these should be fixed before we unmask:
>
>546742: x11-apps/sessreg-1.1.0 fail to build with gcc5
>547626: dev-lang/python-3.3 / 3.4 test_faulthandler hangs with GCC 5.1
>547950: app-shells/zsh-5.0.7-r2 builds but has runtime errors with GCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/2/2015 10:27 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger
>> wrote: I think we need a news item to remind
>> people they really do have to emerge -e @world afte
Hello,
I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd.
It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the
selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the
systemd use flag is also masked.
That's perfectly fine and I suppose it is val
While adding libressl support I encountered a lot of ebuilds that do
stuff like:
ssl? ( dev-libs/openssl )
There are very few cases where this is actually correct.
FYI:
# cave contents dev-libs/openssl:0.9.8
/usr/lib64
/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.0.9.8
There are no hea
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:49:48AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd.
>
> It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the
> selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the
> sys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
William Hubbs schrieb:
| Display-If-Installed: <=sys-fs/openrc-0.18
That should be sys-apps/openrc, no?
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguy?n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWDs8vXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJ
On 10/02/2015 09:50 AM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> What I do not understand, I see these for hardened/../no-multilib, but I
> do not see anything for default/.../no-multilib. Why? as far as I can
> tell, they are masked in the same way so why isnt it complaining about
> default?
If you don't use 'repoma
On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for sys-apps/systemd.
>
> It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the
> selinux profiles) cannot depend on sys-apps/dbus[systemd], because the
> systemd use flag is a
All,
it has come up in discussion of how to handle aufs file systems (or
maybe how not to) that /etc/init.d/mount-ro may be able to be removed from
OpenRC [1].
Does anyone know why we need this init script (it is Linux only), or why
we can't remove it?
William
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:59:06 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Does anyone know why we need this init script (it is Linux only), or
> why we can't remove it?
>
This script is there to make sure as much effort as possible has been
done to prevent file system corruption before rebooting/powering off.
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:08:29 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for
> > sys-apps/systemd.
> >
> > It is basically telling me that systemd (which is masked in the
> > selinux profiles) cann
On 10/02/2015 04:40 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:08:29 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On 10/02/2015 07:49 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am getting the output below when I run repoman full for
>>> sys-apps/systemd.
>>>
>>> It is basically telling me that systemd
Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI
Author: Mike Frysinger
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-10-02
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
GCC 5 uses the new C++ ABI by default. When building new code, you might run
into link time errors like:
...: u
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 09:50 AM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> > What I do not understand, I see these for hardened/../no-multilib, but I
> > do not see anything for default/.../no-multilib. Why? as far as I can
> > tell, they are masked in the same way s
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:13:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI
> Author: Mike Frysinger
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2015-10-02
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
>
> GCC 5 uses the new C++ ABI by defaul
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:13:09PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI
> Author: Mike Frysinger
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2015-10-02
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
>
> GCC 5 uses the new C++ ABI by
25 matches
Mail list logo
