On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 04:52:51 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount
> >> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and
> >
On 09/30/2015 08:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The thing is that I think the libressl authors are shooting themselves
>> in the feet. When upstreams do this sort of thing they think they're
>> making the upgrade path easier by not changing their symbo
On 09/30/2015 10:11 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 08:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
>> On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> The thing is that I think the libressl authors are shooting themselves
>>> in the feet. When upstreams do this sort of thing they think they're
>>> making the u
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
wrote:
> On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The thing is that I think the libressl authors are shooting themselves
>> in the feet. When upstreams do this sort of thing they think they're
>> making the upgrade path easier by not changing t
On 09/30/2015 01:22 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> The thing is that I think the libressl authors are shooting themselves
>>> in the feet. When upstreams do this sort of thing they think they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 01:27 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 01:22 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
..
>> Perhaps the in-between solution would be for f
On 09/30/2015 01:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 01:27 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 09/30/2015 01:22 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
>>> wrote:
On 9/29/15 3:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> ..
>
>>> Perhaps the in-between soluti
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> The way I see it this is relevant to the discussion at hand.
Admittedly it is a bit tangential, but it didn't seem worth forking
the thread over. Certainly I'm not going to invent my own mailing
list and post it there, and then po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 01:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> wrote:
>>
>> The way I see it this is relevant to the discussion at hand.
>
> Admittedly it is a bit tangential, but it didn't seem worth
> for
Hi,
is no active maintainer for tcltk in Gentoo anymore.
Please stand up or try to remove tcltk support from your packages.
Justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2015 01:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> I think it was fair to pause to see if somebody could come up with
>> a better solution that allows co-existence, but absent that I
>> don't see any benefit from keeping libressl ou
On 09/30/2015 02:10 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 01:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> I think it was fair to pause to see if somebody could come up with
>> a better solution that allows co-existence, but absent that I
>> don't see any benefit from keeping libressl out of the tr
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:22:40 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 02:10 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 09/30/2015 01:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> I think it was fair to pause to see if somebody could come up with
> >> a better solution that allows co-existence, but absent that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/15 07:42 AM, hasufell wrote:
> * libressl has to conflict with openssl
Right now libressl exports many of the same symbols as openssl
right? What if it didn't -- that is, we forced a symver map with a
libressl prefix on all symbols? That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/15 09:11 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Suppose apache uses libfoo and libbar. Libfoo switches to
> libressl, and libbar sticks with openssl. That is going to
> create a mess no matter what you do with isolating their
> namespaces, because y
On 9/30/15 12:18 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/15 07:42 AM, hasufell wrote:
* libressl has to conflict with openssl
Right now libressl exports many of the same symbols as openssl
right? What if it didn't -- that is, we forced a symver map
Hello, multilibbers!
It seems that one year past last election has passed. The team's not
doing much lately either now that the major part of the work is done.
This pretty much brings two possibilities:
1. electing a new lead,
2. or deciding that the project is no longer needed and discontinuing
Hello, everyone.
There's been a while since we re-manned the Xfce team. Since then, I
wasn't able to get any reply from the old team members. And after all,
the team lead election is way overdue, so I'd like to go along with
other teams and start a new election.
Let's start by setting up a two-we
Dnia 2015-09-30, o godz. 21:36:51
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> Hello, multilibbers!
>
> It seems that one year past last election has passed. The team's not
> doing much lately either now that the major part of the work is done.
> This pretty much brings two possibilities:
>
> 1. electing a new l
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> Yes you could use symbol versioning, and you can do the side by side by
> renaming the library but that's a real pita for us since we'd have to hack
> build systems to link against the correct library name. Ths should have
> been done
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:58:34 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
> > @rich0. Just a side comment. You said somewhere that maybe apache will
> > choose openssl and postfix libressl and then we'll be in trouble. No. The
> > incompatibilit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 04:01 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 30/09/15 03:57 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Dnia 2015-09-30, o godz. 21:36:51 Michał Górny
>> napisał(a):
>
>>> Hello, multilibbers!
>>>
>>> It seems that one year past last election has passed.
22 matches
Mail list logo
