Hi!
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:04:11 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > If we're talking about human parsing, can you give an example of how
> > variation makes your life more difficult today? I'm just trying to
> > understand what we're trying to fix...
>
# Hans de Graaff (27 Apr 2015)
# rubyforge.org has not been available for almost a year, making the
# rubyforge package obsolete. echoe is a leaf package that still
# depends on it. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/echoe
dev-ruby/rubyforge
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
# Hans de Graaff (27 Apr 2015)
# This version of rubinius is old and only very few
# packages ever got the associated "rbx" RUBY_TARGET.
# If you would like to keep rubinius in Gentoo, please
# help us to get the currently masked rubinius 2.x
# versions ready. Masked for removal in 30 days.
=dev-l
Hi,
The current ruby eclasses work fairly well for ruby-only packages, but
support for packages where ruby is only part of the package are not well
served. As a start the ruby team proposes the following new eclass,
ruby-single.eclass. The purpose of this eclass is to provide support for
the case
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as excerpted:
> On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++
>> based packages were marked some way.
>
>
> revdep-rebuild --soname 'libstd
On 04/26/15 23:21, Duncan wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as excerpted:
On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++
based packages were marked some way.
revdep-reb
# Ulrich Müller (28 Apr 2015)
# Superseded by the newer "breqn" and "mathtools"
# modules in dev-texlive/texlive-latexrecommended.
# mh is no longer maintained upstream. Bug 524114.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-tex/mh
pgpqLx2CHD8_j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:38:09 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:25:20 +0100
> James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:10:30 +0200
> > Patrice Clement wrote:
> >
> > > Tuesday 07 Apr 2015 20:41:05, Pacho Ramos wrote :
> > > > Wouldn't be possible to show a repoman warnin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 04/26/15 23:21, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as excerpted:
>>
>>> On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
Of course, one thing that could make the pro
