On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:13:16 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> Please also note that some packages support only one of the two
> >> implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages may
> >> result in blockers requiring the user changes the global USE=libav
> >> state. The most notable e
Sebastian Pipping posted on Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:56:30 +0200 as excerpted:
>> $ echo "Apache AddHandler/AddType vulnerability protection" | wc -c 51
>>
>> GLEP 42 says max title length 44 chars. 51-44=7 chars too long.
>
> Actually, echo prints a newline that is also counted [use echo -n].
> So
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:10:30 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Alec Warner posted on Sun, 05 Apr 2015 09:33:24 -0700 as excerpted:
>
> > No need to shout.
>
> Apology to you and others. And thanks.
>
> While I am of course familiar with CAPS=shout, I always considered it
> ent
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:13:16 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 6 April 2015 at 17:35, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-04-06, o godz. 14:10:12
> > Ben de Groot napisał(a):
> >
> >> On 30 March 2015 at 00:23, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > Dnia 2015-03-30, o godz. 00:07:16
> >> >
> >> > Include exampl
Ben de Groot wrote:
> I see no reason to stick with libav as default, except political
> (which I'm trying to avoid here).
It's very convenient to try to ignore politics, but IMO that's no
better in open source than on election day. A default is always a
political choice.
With any choice, the mai
El lun, 06-04-2015 a las 23:31 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> On 6 April 2015 at 23:07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Packages that will compile against either one get "|| (openssl libressl)".
> > Packages that require a specific one will just have that one listed. Openssl
> > will block Li
El mar, 07-04-2015 a las 09:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier escribió:
[...]
> I'd rather drop entirely that part about mplayer/mpv; I agree this is
> something users need to be aware of if we recommend mpv but with ffmpeg
> as default the "mplayer hard requires ffmpeg" is no longer an issue.
> Otherwise,
El dom, 05-04-2015 a las 17:16 +0100, James Le Cuirot escribió:
> Hello all,
>
> Firstly, I would like to take this opportunity to remind all devs
> touching ebuilds with Java .jar dependencies about the importance of
> restricting these dependencies to specific SLOTs.
>
> There is no cross-platf
hasufell wrote:
> This is something that has to be resolved upstream. If they don't
> cooperate long-term, then their fork will just die out for sure
> (and for good).
I agree that this is what one would intuitively expect, but what
actually happens is that whatever is perceived as most mainstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Andreas K. Huettel http://www.akhuettel.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVJEWNXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF
MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Andreas K. Huettel http://www.akhuettel.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVJEYzXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF
MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5A
Ian Delaney posted on Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:02:39 +0800 as excerpted:
> Personally I found your post most entertaining and had me riti (rolling
> in the isles). Like the use of cap, humour is rather an inexact science
Thanks. That's the way it was intended, haha but serious, making the
point in w
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
> # Andreas K. Huettel # EAPI=1, last upstream release 2007, last significant
> # ebuild commit 2007. Masked for removal in 30 days.
> app-laptop/gtkpbbuttons
No removal bug number?
Ulrich
pgpA9LKQRI11F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
