Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags?

2015-03-09 Thread Ben de Groot
On 9 March 2015 at 04:17, Johannes Huber wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 21:50:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >> > On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> >> Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gitolite with WebHooks: testers wanted

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > Amongst Git migration preparations, one of the previously mentioned > items was that GitHub's webhooks were very useful for many tasks. > > The QA team is already using them on the gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror > repo, to trigger

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags?

2015-03-09 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
If qt5 is set as a USE flag, it should be preferred over a qt4 USE flag. The use explicitly opted in. Also, most software that does run with Qt5 runs better with Qt5, and supports numerous features such as better HighDPI support.