[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Remove parallel run support from multilib & multibuild

Hello, everyone. Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from multibuild completely. The goal is to make things simpler, and follow PMS properly. Right now the parallel runs imply running commands in a subsh

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] multilib-minimal: do not run src_configure() in parallel

--- eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass b/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass index 4e1843e..3f6cfbd 100644 --- a/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass +++ b/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ multilib-

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] multilib-build: unparallelize multilib_parallel_foreach_abi

--- eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/multilib-build.eclass b/eclass/multilib-build.eclass index 2e35d47..b0a4ea1 100644 --- a/eclass/multilib-build.eclass +++ b/eclass/multilib-build.eclass @@ -223,18 +223,18 @@ multili

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] multibuild: remove parallel run support

--- eclass/multibuild.eclass | 48 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/multibuild.eclass b/eclass/multibuild.eclass index 03e6280..bb17421 100644 --- a/eclass/multibuild.eclass +++ b/eclass/multibuild.eclass @@ -26,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Remove parallel run support from multilib & multibuild

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:36:29 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove > the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from > multibuild completely. [...] > Your thoughts? +1 I hate parallel builds as I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: metadata.xml un-ization, v2

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > This would be by far the easiest solution. Some herds already have an > alias like this eg. freedesktop -> freedesktop-bugs. Much easier than > mass-editing every single metadata.xml with what amounts to a cosmetic > change. > I think w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-im/linpopup, app-office/teapot, net-irc/bitchx, sys-power/cpufrequtils, x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq, media-sound/gnome-alsamixer, sys-devel/ac-archive, net-misc/emirror

On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:31 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Regarding the gkrellm-plugins, looks like Fedora is supplying this > one: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gkrellm-freq.git/tree/gkrellm-freq.spec > > I rewrote ebuild for gkrellm-gkfreq plugin a bit https://github.com/cerebru

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

On 12/09/2014 11:21, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11 > Alexis Ballier napisał(a): > >> On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100 >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success >>> it will be readded at some point. However, I w