On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
> Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
>
> > net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
> > can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
> > handled automatically by port
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "Steven J. Long" wrote:
>
> > Closing those bugs as WONTFIX is more work, and in some cases the bugs
> > would be justified, if the user is on the slow arch in question.
>
> They are less work; since it lets the slower arches move their work to
> bugs of important packages th
Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > in its last session the Gentoo council decided that 30 days from now the
> > entire profile tree will be updated to require EAPI=5 support.
..
> > If you are running an installation that has not been updated for more than
> > a
> >
04.02.14 20:53, Donnie Berkholz написав(ла):
> On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
>> Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
>> Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
>>
>>> net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
>>> can be useful for some users. I think it would be ni
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:03:20 +
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > They are less work; since it lets the slower arches move their work
> > to bugs of important packages that need their attention, instead of
> > bugs of non-important packages were the stabilization isn't really
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:08 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "The -* keyword is special. It is used to indicate package versions
> which are not worth trying to test on unlisted archs." [1]
>
> You can keep rehashing about "winning", but all it does is break policy.
>
> [1]: http://devmanual.gentoo.
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:23:28 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:08 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > "The -* keyword is special. It is used to indicate package versions
> > which are not worth trying to test on unlisted archs." [1]
> >
> > You can keep rehashing about "win
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:07 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:23:28 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:08 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> >
> > > "The -* keyword is special. It is used to indicate package versions
> > > which are not worth trying to tes
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having
> something working we should just remove ebuilds of working packages.
s/should/could/ s/ebuilds/stable keyword or last stable version/
It is at the maintainer's discr
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having
> > something working we should just remove ebuilds of working packages.
>
> s/should/could/ s/ebuilds/sta
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
>> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>
>> > Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having
>> > something working we should just remov
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:15:47 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
> > Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> >
> > > Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having
> > > something working we should
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:28:28 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> I've drafted and thrown away so many replies to Tom in this thread.
What do you want to tell us about this thread?
> Thanks for putting up with it, but it's a huge waste of your time.
Why? This discussion has a goal which we are trying to
13 matches
Mail list logo
