Hello,
I'd like to raise another issue I've met again recently. Shortly put,
some of our projects are relying too much on their overlays. The net
result is that some of their packages in the tree are not well-tested,
semi-broken and users end up being hurt by that.
The major project where this ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff in
> overlays?
>
It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors and less
responsibility/noise in case of bugs.
If there is a bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:59:48 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff in
> > overlays?
> >
>
> It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2013 07:02 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:59:48 +0200 hasufell
> wrote:
>> On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
>>> Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff
>>> in overlays?
>>>
>
>> It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> > Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
> > management support for overlays?
>
> No.
You make a persuasive argument. I realise now that the Summer of Code
projects for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2013 07:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
> wrote:
>>> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
>>> management support for overlays?
>
>> No.
>
> You make a persuasive argument.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
> wrote:
>>> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
>>> management support for overlays?
>
>> No.
>
> You make a persuasive argument.
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 18:59:48 schrieb hasufell:
> On 06/12/2013 06:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Teams, what are the main reasons for keeping that much stuff in
> > overlays?
>
> It's a mix of easier workflow especially for contributors and less
> responsibility/noise in case of bugs.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michał Górny [mailto:mgo...@gentoo.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:51 AM
> To: Gentoo Developer Mailing List
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to raise another issue I've met again recently. Shor
what $subject says,
"add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream defined
bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)"
http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938
ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in portage is a hack from me to
postpone this
pretty tired so more eyes is cool
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
>> wrote:
Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
management support for overlays?
>>
>>> No.
>>
>
> We need wor
On 06/12/2013 06:31 PM, Greg Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
>> On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
>>> wrote:
> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
> managemen
HI ALL:
Is it ok to introduce USE=dmalloc global flag? description as following
"dmalloc - Enable debugging with the dmalloc library"
current consumers:
1) net-fs/autofs
2) net-misc/directvnc
3) sci-biology/yass
also
4) app-admin/conserver
5) net-nds/ypbind
6) net-fs/samba
7) net-analyz
On 13 June 2013 13:35, Dennis Lan (dlan) wrote:
> HI ALL:
>Is it ok to introduce USE=dmalloc global flag? description as following
> "dmalloc - Enable debugging with the dmalloc library"
>
> current consumers:
> 1) net-fs/autofs
> 2) net-misc/directvnc
> 3) sci-biology/yass
>
> also
> 4)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
>
> Ah btw how's that git migration coming along?
>
Even though we're drifting here an update is probably due.
At this point I'd say we have pretty high confidence that we can
accurately migrate the tree. The issues that remain shouldn'
> The main reason it isn't is because nobody wants to use CVS. For good
> examples, see sunrise or
> gentoo-haskell.
As a part of gentoo-haskell team, I'd like to say that CVS issue is
not strongest one, there are
much more meaningful reasons for having much stuff in overlays at
least for haskell
Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11
Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
> what $subject says,
>
> "add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream defined
> bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)"
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938
>
> ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in p
Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:54
"Dennis Lan (dlan)" napisał(a):
> also
> 4) app-admin/conserver
> 5) net-nds/ypbind
> 6) net-fs/samba
> 7) net-analyzer/scli
> 8) net-analyzer/traceproto
> 6) net-misc/siproxd
>
> use dmalloc but controlled under USE=debug
Do those use USE=debug solely fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dnia 2013-06-12, o godz. 13:23:04
Michael Orlitzky napisał(a):
> We need worse support for overlays, i.e. no. Having to use >3 overlays
> defeats the purpose of a QA'd tree. Everything in an (official)
> overlay should be in package.mask instead. T
On 13/06/13 07:58, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11
Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
what $subject says,
"add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream defined
bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)"
http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938
ie. the pkg-confi
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Alexander V Vershilov
wrote:
> The main point that haskell ecosystem is very breaky and only latest
> version is supported, so
> the safest path is to be on a bleeding edge and patch inconsistent
> applications. So if one
> package gets updated then commonly we nee
21 matches
Mail list logo
