On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:46:49 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > To be honest, I think the first thing to do would be fixing the test
> > suites to skip tests which fail due to internet connection being
> > unavailable. Well, there would
Michał Górny posted on Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:38:50 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:06:58 +0200 Tobias Klausmann
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > There's a very simple yet custom solution I'm using. Shortly saying:
>> > checkout the kernel git to /usr/src/linu
For a long time I have been observing ppc team reacts really slowly to
stabilization requests, causing us to need to keep old ebuilds for a
long time. Maybe it's time to start dropping stable keywords for ppc as
looks like team doesn't have enough man power to keep stable updated.
What do you thin
On 07/08/2012 07:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
For a long time I have been observing ppc team reacts really slowly to
stabilization requests, causing us to need to keep old ebuilds for a
long time. Maybe it's time to start dropping stable keywords for ppc as
looks like team doesn't have enough man po
I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and
advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so
that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it up the flagpole to
upstream.
I just saw that it's now CC'd to "maintainer-needed". I don't like it
when packages I use
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and
> advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so
> that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it up the flagpole to
> upstream.
>
> I just saw that it's now
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:53 PM, David Abbott wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and
>> advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so
>> that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it u
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they inherit
it if ne
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
> just an eclass like the ot
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
>> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
>> should each eclass make sure it imp
I just fixed a (reported) buffer overflow on it (not a security bug),
but the code is very bad and I'm expecting more issues in the future.
The ebuild wasn't bumped since 2008, the upstream FTP site is entirely
gone (there's no more the _domain_ of it), and net-ftp/tftp-hpa should
replace it in al
Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
> I just fixed a (reported) buffer overflow on it (not a security bug),
> but the code is very bad and I'm expecting more issues in the future.
>
> The ebuild wasn't bumped since 2008, the upstream FTP site is entirely
> gone (there's no more the _domain_ of it), and ne
Just a few more packages that I'm no longer using or for which I no
longer have hardware or so on so forth. Yes I'm still cleaning this
stuff up.
Notes in brackets below a list.
* indicates a dependency of the described package;
+ indicates there is another maintainer/herd for it anyway.
app-cryp
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
> Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning users of
> netkit-tftp can be tracked.
Here it is:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362
And actually Robin K. who submitted the overflow bug I fixed, pointed
ou
Hi all,
To have a better support for Gentoo lxc guests, it would be nice if our
default inittab contained a line for handling SIGPWR sent to PID 1 to
shut the system down.
As far as I can tell systemd and upstart already do that, which then
makes it possible to have LXC handle most Linux guests j
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
> just an ecla
Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
>> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
>> should each eclass make sure it
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
> > Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning users of
> > netkit-tftp can be tracked.
>
> Here it is:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió:
> Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > René Neumann wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> >> base.eclass: Is this eclass
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere,
> > i.e. should each
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
>
> René Neumann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> > should each
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-07-08 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
games-util/nforenum 2012-07-02 04:55:38 mr_bones_
net-libs/xulrunner 2012-07-04 07:18:48 ssuominen
net-misc/mDNSResponder
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> > Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
> > > Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning
> > > users of netkit-tftp can be track
On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > René Neumann wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status'
> > > of base.ecl
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> >
> > René Neumann wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status'
> > > of base.e
26 matches
Mail list logo
