Mike Gilbert writes:
> My main concern is that many people probably have sys-boot/grub in
> @world.
How about a news item advising people to put sys-boot/grub:0 in their
world file to retain grub:0?
> If grub:2 is made visible, portage will install it, and will remove
> grub-0.97 on the next d
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:35:19 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 12:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I
> > would like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it
> > hits the tree. I don't do much work on base system packa
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library
when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @ configure time
Checking for building library support: not found
setting MAKEOPTS=-j1 does not suffice FEATURES=-distcc is needed
FYI the check is inside
buildtools/wafsamba
Open a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ instead of mailing here.
Yeah, I know bugzilla is down but it's only temporary.
- Samuli
On 06/25/2012 02:54 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library
when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/06/12 08:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico
>>> wrote:
A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI
# Samuli Suominen (25 Jun 2012)
# Replaced by the new 1.0.0 release of x11-apps/transset.
# Removal in 30 days.
x11-misc/transset-df
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
> I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
> advice on how to make thi
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
> older version. Even if it removes the older one, everything necessary
> is installed into /boot and the MBR already.
Portage will remove the older slot the next time the
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:15:59 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the
> tree. I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like
> some advice on how to make t
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:15:59 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
>> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the
>> tree. I don't do much work on base s
On 06/25/2012 06:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 23/06/12 08:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico
wrote:
> A dependency atom will have optional SLOT a
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein
> wrote:
>> Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
>> older version. Even if it removes the older one, everything necessary
>> is installed into /boo
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein
>> wrote:
>>> Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
>>> older version. Ev
I'm not sure if you're supposed to announce these things or not, so here goes.
The app-doc herd will maintain packages in app-doc/ that don't otherwise
have a maintainer. Most of this stuff is either static or updated
infrequently by script, but if you're interested feel free to join.
Because th
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:43:47 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:56:25 -0400 as excerpted:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Goldstein
> > wrote:
> >> Since Grub Legacy and Grub 2 are slotted, Portage won't remove the
> >> olde
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted:
> Profiles do not set a "default bootloader" so I have no idea what you
> are talking about.
I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was
a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a defau
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:58:13 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, hasufell wrote:
> > So, I will file a documentation bug unless someone can point me in
> > the right direction. I didn't find a reference to that issue.
> Open a bug, write a devmanual patch and I will be happy t
Ryan Hill posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:57:30 -0600 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:58:13 +0100 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> > So, I will file a documentation bug unless someone can point me in
>> > the right direction. I didn't find a reference
# Hans de Graaff (26 Jun 2012)
# Dead upstream. QA problems in ebuild. Still uses old
# ruby.eclass. Use dev-ruby/memcache-client instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/Ruby-MemCache
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
19 matches
Mail list logo
