# Pawel Hajdan, Jr. (17 Apr 2012)
# Masked for testing and review.
>=sys-auth/pambase-20120417
>=sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1
>=sys-apps/hardened-shadow-0.9-r1
Please help testing above packages (feel free to skip hardened-shadow if
you're not using it, but I'm pretty sure you have
As lcd herd is empty for some time, these are the packages that are for
grabs now:
app-misc/g15mpd
app-misc/glcdprocdriver
app-misc/lcd-stuff
app-misc/lcd4linux
app-misc/lcdproc
dev-libs/luise-bin
dev-libs/serdisplib
media-libs/libirman
I will move them to maintainer-needed (keeping lcd herd and i
Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
Thank you.
--
http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/
kabel
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
> Thank you.
You can just follow the version bump request:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315
--
A
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
> > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
> > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are).
>
> You can just follow the version bump request
Thank you.
On 17.04.2012 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote:
>>> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be
>>> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6
# Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012)
# ruby-gnome2 modules obsoleted by upstream. These are
# no longer maintained and mostly depend on gnome
# components that have been obsoleted themselves.
# bug 408251 for ruby-gtkmozembed, no specific bug
# for the other components, nothing in the tree depends
# on
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> # Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012)
You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your
ChangeLog entries.
Cheers,
jer
PS: I've seen this more and more the last few months. What's going on?
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 23:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200
> Hans de Graaff wrote:
>
> > # Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012)
>
> You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your
> ChangeLog entries.
No, this is from the package.mask file where
