Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

Markos Chandras : > Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had to > choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@ and > mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus. Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them? BR, Paweł Rumian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Paweł Rumian wrote: > Markos Chandras : > >> Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had >> to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@ >> and mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus. >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due mrness retirement

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:02:17 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-util/dialogblocks > dev-util/helpblocks wxwidgets will take these. -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due bass retirement

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:09:39 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 21:20 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:34:22 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 23:56 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100 > > > >