Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 17:39:48 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'll post binaries here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/ i've posted a stage3 tarball there now built with catalyst. if people want to give it a spin and file bugs, that'd probably be cool. notes: - don't waste time on sta

[gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread octoploid
Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > On Tuesday 06 December 2011 17:39:48 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i'll post binaries here: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/x32/ > > i've posted a stage3 tarball there now built with catalyst. if people want > to > give it a spin and file bugs, that'd pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: > Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > > - x32 is the default ABI > > Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the > toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't it make sense to > build gcc, binutils, et.al. as 64-bit LSB e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: >> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: >> >  - x32 is the default ABI >> >> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the >> toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 14:36:25 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > >> > - x32 is the default ABI > >> > >> Given that it's relatively easy to hit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: >>> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: >>> >  - x32 is the default ABI >>> >>> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Mike Gilbert schrieb: > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under > half that without the debug. > > I'm pretty sure there gentoo users on x86 that are able to build it; > it does have an x86 keyword afterall. :) Some people mess with kernel/user memory split to avoid H

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:36:52 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Gilbert schrieb: > > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under > > half that without the debug. > > > > I'm pretty sure there gentoo users on x86 that are able to build it; > > it does have