[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 unmasking

2011-10-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:38:32 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > Now that I finally have some time for Gentoo.I'd like to get GCC 4.6 unmasked > sometime in the next month. Thanks to everyone but me, we only have a few > bugs remaining on the tracker. None of them I consider critical except maybe > mplaye

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies

2011-10-30 Thread Petteri Räty
On 28.10.2011 2.50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:47, Ryan Hill wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain should not start using EAPI 2. >> >> I await your patch to toolchain.eclass. :P > > i wouldn't bo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Shutdown of berlios

2011-10-30 Thread Petteri Räty
On 29.10.2011 12.39, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > If the upstream is dead I have no clear idea what to do, but maybe > infra could set-up something download.gentoo.org where we could keep > all the files with their sums and gpg sign from us gentoo devs to > ensure their validity. > The files should

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-scheme/plt-scheme (fails to compile and replaced by dev-scheme/racket)

2011-10-30 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (31 Oct 2011) # Fails to compile with libpng15 and replaced by # dev-scheme/racket # See bugs 389041 and 324161 # Removal in 30 days dev-scheme/plt-scheme

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Petteri Räty
On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for > keeping these before i punt them ? > -mike > Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break backwards comp

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason >> for keeping these before i pun

Re: [gentoo-dev] Shutdown of berlios

2011-10-30 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 29.10.2011 12.39, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > >> >> If the upstream is dead I have no clear idea what to do, but maybe >> infra could set-up something download.gentoo.org where we could keep >> all the files with their sums and gpg sign from us

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/31/2011 12:37 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >>> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason >>> for keeping these before i

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for > > keeping these before i punt them ? > > Breaking overlays. Isn

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-10-30 23h59 UTC

2011-10-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2011-10-30 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/ktsuss 2011-10-27 21:38:09 tomka dev-php5/pecl-timezonedb2011-10-28 14:00:09 olemarkus kde-misc/knetwor

[gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies

2011-10-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:24:12 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 28.10.2011 2.50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:47, Ryan Hill wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >>> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain should not start using EAPI 2. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] redundant code in toolchain.eclass?

2011-10-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 26 October 2011 10:20:54 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > The second IUSE+=" nossp" seems redundant and could be removed, right? looks like a fix was committed: http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/toolchain.eclass?r1=1.473&r2=1.474 -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:17:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: > > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reaso

[gentoo-dev] Re: Old changelogs / eclass dir

2011-10-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:46:30 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Dear all, > > two small suggestions regarding ChangeLogs: > > 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? > In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical > reasons... Should we still start one?

Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?

2011-10-30 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 10/30/11 23:33, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, >> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for >> keeping these before i punt them ? >> -mike >> > > Breaking overlays. grepping