[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: xfce-extra/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin

2011-09-29 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (29 Sep 2011) # Incompatible with >= gnome-panel-3 and has issues wrt bug 358171 # http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/2011-May/028870.html # Removal in 30 days xfce-extra/xfce4-xfapplet-plugin

[gentoo-dev] Manifest signing

2011-09-29 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ... again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can agree to reject unsigned manifests? Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing

2011-09-29 Thread Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
On 29/09/11 16:02, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Is there any chance that we can agree to reject > unsigned manifests? Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate? I am happy to back a mandatory signing policy for the main gentoo-x86 tree. This is a simple yes or no question that the council c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing

2011-09-29 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 29-09-2011 11:02:17 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ... > again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree > are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can agree to reject > unsigned manifests? Po

[gentoo-dev] libtool.eclass update to allow @...@ replacements in patches

2011-09-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
cleaned up ELT_try_and_apply_patch a bit, and added support for @GENTOO_LIBDIR@ in patches -mike --- libtool.eclass +++ libtool.eclass @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ DESCRIPTION="Based on the ${ECLASS} eclass" -inherit toolchain-funcs +inherit multilib toolchain-funcs ELT_PATCH_DIR="${ECLASSDIR}/ELT-pa

[gentoo-dev] edos2unix will now `die` for you

2011-09-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
once i double check the tree, i'll be changing `edos2unix` to die automatically when the sed calls (since edos2unix is really just a single call to sed). -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Manifest signing

2011-09-29 Thread Duncan
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:09:57 +0200 as excerpted: > On 29-09-2011 11:02:17 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ... >> again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree >> are still not signe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Manifest signing

2011-09-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 07:08:29PM +, Duncan wrote: > Beyond that, IMO it's now at the "needs a proposal champion to clean it > up and present it to the council" stage, at least at the "council > declared priority" level for getting the requirements into repoman, the > CVS server, and perhap

Re: [gentoo-dev] libtool.eclass update to allow @...@ replacements in patches

2011-09-29 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:28 Thu 29 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: > cleaned up ELT_try_and_apply_patch a bit, and added support for > @GENTOO_LIBDIR@ in patches Is this documented anywhere besides the comment immediately above the implementation? Would be nice for anyone who writes a libtool patch to be more awar

Re: [gentoo-dev] libtool.eclass update to allow @...@ replacements in patches

2011-09-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 17:57:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 13:28 Thu 29 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > cleaned up ELT_try_and_apply_patch a bit, and added support for > > @GENTOO_LIBDIR@ in patches > > Is this documented anywhere besides the comment immediately above the > implement