Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-05 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 07/05/10 03:03, Olivier Crête wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it >> certainly doesnt warrant a paniced "the sky is falling" message. > > I think this is a great occasion to dump our stup

[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-05 Thread Duncan
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:02:19 +0530 as excerpted: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Richard Freeman > wrote: >> On 07/04/2010 04:09 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: >>> >>> For those of you not on the #gentoo-dev channel, I just announced I am >>> gonna be looking at the openrc cod

[gentoo-dev] Re: Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hjalmarsson
mån 2010-06-28 klockan 15:05 +0100 skrev Ciaran McCreesh: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:59:21 +0100 > Roy Bamford wrote: > > All of engineering involves compromise. > > It's not a question of compromise. It's a question of being right vs > being wrong. If one person says that 2 + 2 = 4 and a loud mob

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-05 Thread Anthony G. Basile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/10 23:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Richard Freeman wrote: >> On 07/04/2010 04:09 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: >>> >>> For those of you not on the #gentoo-dev channel, I just announced I am >>> gonna be looking at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults

2010-07-05 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 5 July 2010 18:31, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: [...] > 1. (A t-shirt saying 2 + 2 = 5. For this joke to work you have to know > how to round numbers, and that 2 can be rounded from everything between > 1,5 and 2,4, and that 4,8 rounds to 5. And it is still correct math.) Just to take this threat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults

2010-07-05 Thread David Leverton
On 5 July 2010 14:01, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: > 1. (A t-shirt saying 2 + 2 = 5. For this joke to work you have to know > how to round numbers, and that 2 can be rounded from everything between > 1,5 and 2,4, and that 4,8 rounds to 5. And it is still correct math.) You said yourself that it's a j

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/gtk+: gtk+-2.20.1-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 à 13:08 +, Fabian Groffen (grobian) a écrit : > grobian 10/07/03 13:08:01 > > Modified: gtk+-2.20.1-r1.ebuild ChangeLog > Log: > Fix compilation on Darwin8 > (Portage version: 2.2.01.15352-prefix/cvs/Darwin powerpc) > > Revision ChangesPa

[gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar with internals of current code before trying to understand these minor changes. Suggestions about indentation and quoting will be rejected. -- Ar

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/gtk+: gtk+-2.20.1-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-07-2010 16:46:26 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > - # add correct framework linking options, for aqua > > - epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-2.18.5-macosx-aqua.patch" > > + # Fix for missing NSUInteger on Darwin8 (10.4) > > + [[ ${CHOST} == *-darwin8 ]] && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-da

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > with internals of current code before trying to understand these minor >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > > with internals of

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Brian Harring schrieb: > Requiring policykit, let alone networkmanager and dbus as a default is > not something I'd personally agree with as a sane choice. If you're > trying to build *just* a desktop distro, sure, it's sane. We're not > however, thus invalidating those options from where

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb: > What you are saying makes sense for desktop users since they will > likely already have consolekit/policykit/nm-applet installed, and > hence using NetworkManager for all network management makes sense. Actually, I've got several Gentoo-based desktop systems, none o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): >> On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already >>> reviewed on alias of Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 18:26:40 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > >> On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > >>> These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:34:38 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > You should read relevant part of comment #7: > "The colors can of course be continued to be used in outputs that are > purely build time outputting and not for communicating things for > users like what cmake builds do.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > 2010-07-05 18:26:40 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): >> On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): On 07/05

Re: [gentoo-dev] Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that

2010-07-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 08:51 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit : > I've recently stumbled upon several packages unnecessarily using old > preserve_old_lib feature from eutils.eclass, namely: > > libgnomekbd > libproxy > > And then users hit issues like this: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_

[gentoo-dev] zlib ebuild from OSS-QM

2010-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, here's an ebuild for zlib, which takes a fixed source from the oss-qm project. it contains several fixes and cleans up ugly hacks in the current ebuild (eg. directly sed'ing sources ;-o). please refer my recent postings on details what the oss-qm project is all about. just a few words:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > > 2010-07-05 18:26:40 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > >> On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > >>> 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 18:37:37 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): > You're cluttering up your eclass with pointless junk > under the mistaken impression that more complicated eclasses are > better. These eclasses don't contain any unnecessary code (except deprecated functions/variables). > Besides, if you're not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > > Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > > > python.eclass uses colors for build time outputting, which doesn't > > > communicate an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:38:32PM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > > > Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > > > > python.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 05-07-2010 a las 19:38 +0200, Harald van Dijk escribió: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > > > Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a): > > > > python.eclass u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Mark Loeser
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > 2010-07-05 18:26:40 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > > On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > > >> On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/05/2010 08:55 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 05-07-2010 a las 19:38 +0200, Harald van Dijk escribió: >> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar >> Arahesis wrote: >>> 2010-07-05 18:36:09 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): Dne 5.7.2010 18:34, Arfrever Frehtes Taifers

Re: [gentoo-dev] eqawarn for main tree

2010-07-05 Thread Petteri Räty
On 03/12/2010 11:27 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 03/12/2010 11:39 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> In eclasses there's often use for outputting QA warnings for ebuild >> authors (at least in java and python could immediately make use of >> this). Currently Portage has eqawarn available but it's considered

Re: [gentoo-dev] eqawarn for main tree

2010-07-05 Thread Mark Loeser
Petteri Räty said: > On 03/12/2010 11:27 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 03/12/2010 11:39 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> In eclasses there's often use for outputting QA warnings for ebuild > >> authors (at least in java and python could immediately make use of > >> this). Currently Portage has eqawarn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > with internals of current code before trying to understand these minor >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > > 2010-07-05 18:26:40 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > > > On 07/05/2010 07:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > > 2010-07-05 18:13:26 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > > > >> On 07/05/2010 06:23

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Mark Loeser
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > Everyone else has already made valid points. I'm just picking this one > > to reply to now. Please remove the colors you have added. If you need > > a new function, say "eqawarn", we should have that add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > with internals of current code before trying to underst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 20:26:19 Petteri Räty napisał(a): > On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > > with internals of cur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/05/2010 10:59 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > I don't use indentation/quoting, which would violate any rules, but some > people > might try to enforce e.g. EAPI=3 instead of EAPI="3". > You are implying you would never screw up accidentally. Regards, Petteri signat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > > 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > > Everyone else has already made valid points. I'm just picking this one > > > to reply to now. Please remove the colors you have added. If you need > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/05/2010 11:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: >>> 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): Everyone else has already made valid points. I'm just picking this one to reply t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 23:28:01 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > On 07/05/2010 11:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > >>> 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > Everyone else has already mad

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/06/2010 12:38 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-07-05 23:28:01 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): >> On 07/05/2010 11:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > 2010-07-05

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-05 23:49:58 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > On 07/06/2010 12:38 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 2010-07-05 23:28:01 Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > >> On 07/05/2010 11:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > >>> 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 05, 2010 16:23:50 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > > > 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > > > Everyone else has already made valid points. I'm just picking this > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual change notification, was: eqawarn for main tree

2010-07-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:19:30 -0400 Mark Loeser wrote: > Could you please give a description as to when you believe this > function should be used. Preferably as a patch for devmanual :) Devmanual gets patched? No seriously - I guess mail to dev-announce@ would be nice in case of changes to devma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05-07-2010 15:23, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar > with internals of current code

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:50:56 + "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote: > I'm not going to delve into the details that have been addressed all > other this thread. Instead I'll just address one small issue. > The use of *minor* in the title of this thread and the sheer size of > the patch attached

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-07-06 00:29:09 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): > On Monday, July 05, 2010 16:23:50 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 2010-07-05 21:18:57 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis said: > > > > 2010-07-05 20:00:11 Mark Loeser napisał(a): > > > > > Everyone else h

[gentoo-dev] looking for old gcc dist file

2010-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
could people take a look in their distdir and see if they could send me (offlist) the file: gcc-4.0.1-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 i dont know if infra keeps around retired dev's homes, but i'd like ~eradicator/public_html/gcc/ and ~lv/GCC/ ... -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digital

[gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? - Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org - From: bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org Subject: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???) To: weig...@metux.de Reply-To: DO NOT REPLY Date: Mon, 5 Jul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 05, 2010 19:31:59 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > Only 84 ebuilds in the tree set NEED_PYTHON variable. NEED_PYTHON can be > used only in EAPI <=2. python_pkg_setup() is optional in EAPI <=3. Exactly > 0 ebuilds, which use NEED_PYTHON, also call python_pkg_setup(). > EX

Re: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-05 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > does he speak for all of you ? > > - Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org - > > From: bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org > Subject: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from > unofficial sources (???) > To: weig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass

2010-07-05 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/06/2010 02:18 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:50:56 + > "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote: > >> I'm not going to delve into the details that have been addressed all >> other this thread. Instead I'll just address one small issue. >> The use of *minor* in the title of

[gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual change notification

2010-07-05 Thread Torsten Veller
* Jeroen Roovers : > Devmanual gets patched? No seriously - I guess mail to dev-announce@ > would be nice in case of changes to devmanual. Useful for all > developers who don't like getting spammed by the commits mailing list. Since moving from subversion to git we don't get any notification at al