Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-07 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 06/05/10 13:36, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 02:00, Torsten Veller wrote: >> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next >> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). > > I'd like to nominate patrick I accept the nomination. > and vapier. > > Che

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-07 Thread Thilo Bangert
Ryan Hill said: > On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:11:45 +0200 > > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > What do you think about doing the following change in > > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults: > > > > replace "test" with "test-fail-continue" to make it just less > > frustrating (we stil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-07 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05-06-2010 11:12, Anders Hellgren wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Torsten Veller wrote: > >> Hello fellow developers and users. >> >> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next >> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-07 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:10:04 +0200 Thilo Bangert wrote: > i do agree, that all packages should build successfully including the > test phase. RESTRICTing the test and an open bug when this is not the > case. I see more and more calls for either 1) "fixing the test suite", as if that is suddenly n

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-06-07 Thread Ed W
Hi Show me a wiki that makes it easy to create tables, for example, compare RadeonProgram from the x.org wiki: http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonProgram?action=edit ||<-2 style="text-align: center; background-color: #66"> '''Native''' || '''R100''' || '''R200''' || '''R300''' || '''R400'''

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-06-07 Thread Ed W
On 05/04/2010 03:43, Ben de Groot wrote: On 5 April 2010 03:13, Joshua Saddler wrote: Let the renderer take care of the final rendering, as really, tags and markup are all arbitrary. What should matter is how it appears in your webbrowser, since that'll vary from the source view anyways.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-07 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/7/10 12:10 PM, Thilo Bangert wrote: > as it seems, there is disagreement about the issue among developers. > Perhaps the council would like to settle this, so that we can go on with > our lives. > > i do agree, that all packages should build successfully including the test > phase. RESTRIC

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-07 Thread Thilo Bangert
you make valid points regarding the overall improvement of the handling of test suites. I am not opposed to something like that being done... it still seems like there is agreement around the fact that something needs to be done about src_test. currently you cant run a system which generally en

[gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Jim Ramsay
There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just 'X', but thought I'd raise the issue here since this USE flag has been around since before time began. Does anyone care? References: [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 7.6.2010 20:44, Jim Ramsay napsal(a): > There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. > > I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just > 'X', but thought I'd raise the issue here since this USE flag has

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:44:32 -0400 Jim Ramsay wrote: > There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. > > I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just > 'X', but thought I'd raise the issue here since this USE flag has been > around since before time beg

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread dev-random
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:53:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > It's there because if you break your X you probably want a usable > editor to help you fix it. vim, compiled with "vim-with-x" works correctly when X is broken. It doesn't enable X11-based UI, like flag "X" suggests. It just enable

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:05:27 +0400 dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:53:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > It's there because if you break your X you probably want a usable > > editor to help you fix it. > > vim, compiled with "vim-with-x" works correctly when X is broken.

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Jim Ramsay
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:05:27 +0400 > dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:53:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > It's there because if you break your X you probably want a usable > > > editor to help you fix it. > > > > vim, compiled with "vim-with

[gentoo-dev] Retiring

2010-06-07 Thread Maurice van der Pot
Hi guys, Since I have not been active for a long time and I have no motivation at the moment to spend more time on Gentoo, I'll be retiring as a Gentoo dev. This is just for personal reasons; it's not because of Gentoo. There are only a few packages I was maintaining, so if anyone would like to t

[gentoo-dev] Re: app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

2010-06-07 Thread Duncan
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:53:22 +0100 as excerpted: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:44:32 -0400 > Jim Ramsay wrote: >> There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. >> >> I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just >> 'X', but thought I'd