On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:48:32 +0100
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> And I'd appreciate it if PMS would stop refusing to document FEATURES.
> (Double negative? I mean: PMS should document reality)
PMS does document reality: FEATURES can't be used by ebuilds since its
values aren't reliable. Tests have to be
Ok,
as per discussion with remi i slightly updated the eclassdoc and renamed
snapshot variable into saner XORG_EAUTORECONF.
Everything is eclassdoced so it will show up on man xorg-2.eclass when
in main tree.
Does it fit your needs?
Tom
# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under
On 2010.02.27 04:18, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to
> mark
> bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not
> exist? Would it be hard to set up?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> [1] https:/
Sebastian Pipping said:
> Hello!
>
>
> I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark
> bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not
> exist? Would it be hard to set up?
I think the goal was to have http://bugday.gentoo.org/ fill this role
inste
On 02/27/10 17:22, Mark Loeser wrote:
> I think the goal was to have http://bugday.gentoo.org/ fill this role
whenever i visit bugday.gentoo.org it takes minutes to load.
afair for the two bugdays i participated it didn't display anything
helpful (to me), especially: why does it show fixed bugs, t
On 02/27/10 16:39, Roy Bamford wrote:
> That sounds good. If it were an enumerated type bugs could be graded
> for bugday too.
>
> .e.g.
> Novice
> You need to have fixed a few
> Intermediate
> We don't have a clue.
>
> I'm not suggesting any grades - those are just for illustration.
I had tha
On 2010.02.27 17:38, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
[snip]
> what i see as an advantage of the bugzilla-keyword approach is that
> any
> developer can contribute: everyone (especially bug wranglers) can
> mark
> bugs for bugday easily from bugzilla.
>
> bugday.gentoo.org could still be used as an entr
On 02/27/10 19:14, Roy Bamford wrote:
> What would be the criteria for marking a bug as bugday?
I would say something along a "yes" to
Could this task fit for being solved by someone who
is not a Gentoo developer?
It's not precise, does it need to be?
> Why whould it be any better than a p
Roy Bamford said:
> The last few times I've dropped into bugday, its been very quiet, which
> suggests its in need of some tlc but maybe its just my timezone.
Its been pretty much dead. We need more developer involvement so users
can actually talk to them and help resolve issues. If we can't g
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
Sorry, what's "tlc"? Next Saturday is a bugday date again, btw.
Sebastian
Tender Loving Care.
Dale
:-) :-)
On 27 February 2010 21:48, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Roy Bamford said:
>> The last few times I've dropped into bugday, its been very quiet, which
>> suggests its in need of some tlc but maybe its just my timezone.
>
> Its been pretty much dead. We need more developer involvement so users
> can actual
Ben de Groot said:
> > Its been pretty much dead. We need more developer involvement so users
> > can actually talk to them and help resolve issues. If we can't get
> > enough developers to participate then we should just stop trying to do
> > it instead of putting on such a poor showing.
>
> I
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:18:39 +0100
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark
> bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not
> exist? Would it be hard to set up?
I would use it. I honestly didn't know we still did
On 02/25/2010 11:32 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Sorry for the short notice, but the boxes as noted above are going to
> have some brief downtime in the next hour for IP renumbering.
>
> It will briefly take out the anonvcs service, as well as a lot of
> rsync.g.o capacity.
>
> Total downtime sh
14 matches
Mail list logo
