On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:15:57 -0400
Mark Loeser wrote:
> I'd really like to unmask gcc-4.4.1 soon, as in the next week or so.
> If you could please install it and test it out, I would appreciate it.
> Also, if you have any gcc 4.4 porting bugs assigned to a herd that you
> are a part of, resolving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
{{sorry if you receive this message twice. I've got smtp problems and I
had to switch smtp, so please reply to THIS message only}}
there are pieces of software that consist of multiple packages (either
by upstream decision, or by a Gentoo dev that spl
Federico Ferri wrote:
> I can see also why portage is failing:
> when (trying to) upgrading the first package, the whole package set
> enters into a *transient* state, which is not valid for normal usage
> (that is: one 0.14 lib, and all other 0.13 libs), but still has to be
> valid in order for po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> what I am going to propose here is a resolution strategy for this
>> (although this whole thing simply tells me that portage misses some
>> knowledge about the problem, like for example that dependencies should
>> be enforced onl
