Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds

2009-05-21 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-05-20 20:00:43 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): > On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:56 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > This error occurs only when there is no up-to-date cache for given > > ebuild. rsync users would see only the usual "masked by: EAPI 3" > > message. > > We always

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds

2009-05-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 21 May 2009 19:57:49 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > We always have to assume that there might not be an up to date > > cache. The Gentoo rsync mirrors do not always ship up to date cache, > > particularly if someone's just changed a widely used eclass. > > Users can

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55

2009-05-21 Thread Robert R. Russell
On Saturday 16 May 2009 20:17:14 Nick Fortino wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sat, 16 May 2009 16:39:40 -0700 > > > > Nick Fortino wrote: > >> Given the above, it should be clear that any argument which states > >> some future improvement to the ebuild format will be impossible based > >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds

2009-05-21 Thread Duncan
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis posted 200905211957.55040.arfre...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Thu, 21 May 2009 19:57:49 +0200: > 2009-05-20 20:00:43 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): >> On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:56 +0200 >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >> > This error occurs on