On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:17:15 -0700
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
> list to see.
Up or down vote on USE="static-libs". It seems it wasn't actually voted
on las
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:58:53PM +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:17:15 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
> > list to see.
>
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:21:55 -0400
Thomas Anderson wrote:
> Why are we trying to get rid of static libraries again? I have not
> seen any compelling reason to remove libraries that may be useful to
> our users. Perhaps I've missed some discussion(in which case, I'd
> love to read it), but this se
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have
> in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag,
> users who need them could use EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-static".
If you're going to do that, why not d
Thomas Anderson posted
20090419162155.gd21...@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net, excerpted below, on Sun,
19 Apr 2009 12:21:55 -0400:
> Why are we trying to get rid of static libraries again? I have not seen
> any compelling reason to remove libraries that may be useful to our
> users. Perhaps I've misse
On Sunday 19 April 2009 18:14:36 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200
>
> Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have
> > in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag,
> > users who need them could use E
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:14:36 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:10:50 +0200
> Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > A reasonable default would be --disable-static. Then libs that have
> > in-tree consumers of their static libs could then make a use-flag,
> > users who need them could use
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-04-19 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-cluster/openpbs-common 2009-04-14 00:56:16 darkside
net-irc/lostirc 2009-04-14 17:04:30 mr_bones_
dev-lisp/cl-r
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2009, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready:
>
> http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3
>
> The provisional included feature list is everything that was ready
> before the deadline.
Thanks a lot for your work.
Sor
