Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a): >> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild >> versions than ${PV}. >> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? >> >> Cheers, >> Ali

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating EAPI0

2009-03-24 Thread Luca Barbato
Patrick Lauer wrote: [deprecating stuff] I'd rather switch to git first, have eapi in separate branches then, make sure we can provide eapi-N compatibility/migration tree snapshots and then warn people so there will be a easy way to provide fallbacks. Before that I'm afraid it would take too m

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think > that's a good thing. My current view is that "sed patches" should only be used where "static" patches don't work, ignoring laziness (including mine) for the moment. Why do you feel sed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: dev-lang/pugs

2009-03-24 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Veller wrote: > * "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" : >> Torsten Veller wrote: >>> # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009) >>> # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of /usr/lib >>> # 171649 - dev-lang/pugs-

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: >> Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think >> that's a good thing. > > My current view is that "sed patches" should only be used where > "static" patches do

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating EAPI0

2009-03-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:40:05 +0100 Luca Barbato wrote: > I'd rather switch to git first, have eapi in separate branches then, > make sure we can provide eapi-N compatibility/migration tree snapshots > and then warn people so there will be a easy way to provide fallbacks. Uhm. Do you think these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-24 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:08 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote: > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug > and where genst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-24 Thread Gordon Malm
On Monday, March 23, 2009 23:35:00 Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Alfredsen: > > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > > This list contains

[gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Duncan
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" posted 49c8d6ee.3070...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:49:50 +0100: > Lastly I prefer to have the source changes right there in the ebuild > when they are not too elaborate and patches don't allow that. The preference makes sense, but the statement

[gentoo-dev] media-video/mpeg4ip to give out or give up

2009-03-24 Thread Olivier Crête
Hello, mpeg4ip is dead upstream and has various bugs [1] (some we patch, some we don't). I'll package.mask/remove it if no one wants to take it over (and effectively become upstream). [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190959 -- Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer signat