On 2008-08-11 02:15, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Removals:
www-apps/knowledgetree 2008-08-09 21:22:58 hoffie
dev-php4/ZendOptimizer 2008-08-09 21:53:34 robbat2
dev-php4/adodb-ext 2008-08-09 21:53:34 robbat2
dev
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 00:26 Mon 11 Aug , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
for several months. It is now clear to me that Gent
Zac Medico wrote:
> Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining
> new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and
> hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose
> that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed
> property de
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active for
> several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the
> direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates that
> most current Gentoo developers appear to be sa
Zac Medico wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:15:11 -0700
>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Does this seem like a desirable way to represent the "virtual"
>>> attribute? Any suggestions?
>>
>> Again, I'm not so sure that this doesn't represent multiple separable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ingmar.
Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
| Hello list,
|
| As usual with this kind of mails, this has been long overdue, but it's
| about time that I retire from Gentoo.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it's not a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in Gen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bo.
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
| My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
for
| several months.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it isn't a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in Gentoo and in QT/KDE in particular. Als
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ingmar Vanhassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There're other projects in the Free-Software world that I currently
> enjoy putting my time into more, I'm sure it's more than obvious to those
> of you who know me which...
>
Good luck with that project!
--
Santia
2008/8/11 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Many folks are happy at the current pace of development. I imagine
> these two folks were frustrated at the lack
> of new features in the ebuild spec that were readily available in
> kdebuild-1 and decided to move on. More power to them I say.
I'm pre
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active for
> several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the
> direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
> everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of the problem.
Some people think Gentoo should primarily be a fun-loving
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of the problem.
Some people think Gentoo sh
Patrick Lauer wrote:
If it stops being fun only grumpy old men will do the bare minimum to
keep things from breaking too badly instead of improving things. Meh.
I demand mandatory fun hours twice a week! And a coffee machine. And a
pony. Yes! A pony!
Being bitten by the Pony is not fun. Pl
On 11 Aug 2008, at 14:19, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description
Hi,
I'm maintaining a package of merkaartor in gentoo, of which the latest version
requires qt 4.4. I'll mask that for now, but I'm not really happy with that.
I wanted to ask what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4 to get unmasked. The mask
is commented with:
"Masked for testing, various dependen
Hanno Böck wrote:
> So question, what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4? And more general comment,
> especially on important packages that many people rely on, please provide
> more informative comments in package mask, e.g. bug numbers.
Bug numbers should indeed have been provided. The tracker bu
Anthony Metcalf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 11 Aug 2008
14:31:03 +0100:
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>
>> If it stops being fun only grumpy old men will do the bare minimum to
>> keep things from breaking too badly instead of improving things. Meh. I
>> deman
The following packages have been masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/twisted-xish
dev-python/twisted-pair
dev-python/twisted-flow
They are either unmaintained or deprecated and they force downgrade on
the newly stable dev-python/twisted*-8.1.0
dev-python/twibber is also unmaintained and d
18 matches
Mail list logo
