Jeroen Roovers kirjoitti:
-
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I don't mind as I don't have the time to follow upstreams that closely
for the hundreds of Java packages out there.
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
>
> it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
> (who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
>
> it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
> (who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
> be grateful).
>
> Carsten has a cut-and-paste mes
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
They are useful as reminder.
2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
version bump requests?
I won't prevent anybody to send them, but I can understand why people
would rath
Hi everyone
Since people are talking about metadata.xml again I'd like to present two
more GLEPs which will ease the process of auto-assigning bugs on one side
and make it a bit safer on the other side. Both of them are still in draft
state and if someone would like to contribute I'd be really hap
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What do you think of them?
Both seem good, I'm looking forward to see them completed =)
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:26:13 +0100
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
>
> If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for
> example), i
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What do you think of them?
+1 on the first GLEP.
The second GLEP seems like a much better way of doing things, so +1 as
well, but I am no xml expert :)
Cheers,
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
> Just an idea:
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
> welcome?
> It's more of an individual developer preference, but that seems the right
> place for it.
If used, what about including a
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
then upg
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
1. With the addition of cpp, why
do we still need elements?
2. "dev-zero". That's not possible t
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
> 1. With the addition of cpp, why
> do we still need elements?
I'd
Hi,
above series is going stable soon, so please check that the packages
you maintain have a stable version that is ok with .25. If not, file a
stabilisation request and make it block bug 230285. Thanks.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to valid
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
>> Just an idea:
>> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests
>> are welcome? It's more of an individual developer preference, but that
>> seems the right place for it.
> If
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:03:10PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> >
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> >> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
> > 1. With the addition
17 matches
Mail list logo
