On 23-06-2008 15:21:31 -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote:
> Just a quick note here in case you work on Python packages.
> Recently repoman started warning that setuptools may be suspicious as an
> RDEPEND.
>
> A lot of Python packages use another namespace that setuptools provides,
> 'pkg_resources',
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:53:55AM +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've stumbled upon an inconsitency between package managers the other
>> day [1], which was due to both an ebuild and an eclass defining
>> inconsisting KEYWORDS.
>>
>> bla-1.ebuild:
>> inherit
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following
flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
-O1 enables some basic optimizations.
--hash-style=gnu causes that ld creates only new GNU-style hash tables.
--sort-common causes that ld sorts the common symbols by size
On 24-06-2008 14:15:10 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following
> flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
>
> -O1 enables some basic optimizations.
> --hash-style=gnu causes that ld creates only new GN
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> as long as it doesn't go in /base, but in the linux/freebsd profiles
> instead, it's fine with me.
--has-style=gnu should not be used on non-GLIBC systems (I'm unsure
about uclibc, but I'd be surprised if they do implement the GNU style
hash).
--
Die
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:05:39PM +0200, Tiziano M??ller wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:53:55AM +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've stumbled upon an inconsitency between package managers the other
> >> day [1], which was due to both an ebuild and
Now that the packages depending on 2.3 are masked, masking this one
again for removal in 30 days.
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
pgpN7f7hYDgvJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
В Втр, 24/06/2008 в 01:53 +0200, Robert Buchholz пишет:
> I've stumbled upon an inconsitency between package managers the other
> day [1], which was due to both an ebuild and an eclass defining
> inconsisting KEYWORDS.
But do we allow KEYWORDS in eclasses? Why? Each package should be tested
inde
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:17:48 +0200
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24-06-2008 14:15:10 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
> >
> > -
