On 02:35 Thu 05 Jun , Josh Saddler wrote:
> Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council
> members (again):
> dberkholz
Yes. I'd like to continue trying to make the council more effective.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Leverton wrote:
| On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote:
|> Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi?
|>
|> I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my
|> system and with disabled libffi USE-flag.
|
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Alex Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/5 Ali Polatel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I want to nominate:
>>
>> Fernando J. Pereda -- "ferdy"
>> Bo Ørsted Andresen -- "zlin"
>>
>
> Is there a method for objecting to a nomination, kinda like the
> opposite of sec
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:35:16 -0700
> Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current
>> council members (again):
>>
>> amne
>> betelgeuse
>> dberkholz
>> flameeyes
>> jokey
>> lu_zero
>> vapier
>
> As per GLEP 3
Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
Jun 2008 01:37:21 +:
>> 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending
>> appeals what policy do you propose ?
> I'd also add two new requirements:
> 1. Any appeal must be heard
Alex Howells wrote:
In short: vote for me if you want less bullshit, less asshats and a
more fun distribution. That is all.
Damn! Astinus for PM! :)
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:03 +0100
"Richard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Łukasz Damentko wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will
> >> be open for the
After having written this, I realized I might be telegraphing a bit too
much in places. So take the amplifications for what they are worth.
They are more "lawyer like" than my original response, but I don't see
how to put them into a manifesto.
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 01:37 +, Ferris McCormick
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:01:00 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
> Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
> Jun 2008 01:37:21 +:
>
> >> 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending
> >> appeals what policy do you propose ?
>
> >
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:51:22 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replying to myself is evil, but I'm going to try to clarify a bit
> more. GLEPs are more like RFCs. We can't force any application to do
> anything with a GLEP. We technically can't even force Portage to do
> anything i
I wish to nominate a couple more people:
Halcy0n
tsunam
solar
robbat2
KingTaco
All of whom should do a fine job, IMO.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 13:32 Fri 06 Jun , Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 01:37 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> And the bit about hearing appeals assumes that devrel initiated the
> disciplinary action being appealed. I'd make it explicit that Council
> is not itself a disciplinary body --- resol
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:11:44 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I would have thought there was a requirement to have been a
developer for at least a year, just like we require mento
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:35 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
> The Gentoo Foundation and the Gentoo Council are two different entities.
But the one Gentoo
Two heads one body. Usually doesn't work for most animals or humans. One
ends up being a parasite to the other.
> For further reference pleas
On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
>
> "The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated
> to supporting the FreeBSD Project."
>
> It's clear the that BSD Foundation is directly tied to the BSD project.
> I
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 14:13 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
> >
> > "The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated
> > to supporting the FreeBSD Project."
> >
> > It'
On 17:55 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 14:13 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
> > >
> > > "The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organizat
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:23 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> Like comparing Gentoo to a single-brained animal with multiple heads?
But that it is. You have two entities, that both are related to Gentoo
in some form. Overlapping membership, staff, interests, etc.
> No comparisons are perfect, bu
Joe Peterson wrote:
The problem with a simple echo is that no "*" appears on the left to
maintain continuity with the rest of the output - and in a color that
makes sense in the context (maybe this isn't a "problem" - it depends on
whether that visual continuity is desired).
The far biggest pro
Can you take this off-topic thread to the appropriate list? I'm pretty
tired with hearing the Foundation's self-promotional comments on how
important it is to development on this list. You guys have your own
list for that crap, as it is.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategi
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:42 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Joe Peterson wrote:
> > The problem with a simple echo is that no "*" appears on the left to
> > maintain continuity with the rest of the output - and in a color that
> > makes sense in the context (maybe this isn't a "problem" - it depend
Doug Goldstein wrote:
An clearly motivation explanation that I didn't add, which I'm going to
add once I send this is the fact that as per the QA Project,
use.local.desc can not contain a USE flag that already appears globally
in use.desc. This would allow a description for that USE flag to be
Marius Mauch wrote:
It's not about "forcing" anyone to do something but giving people enough
information on how to implement it _if they choose to do so_. With the
current GLEP they'd have to make arbitrary decisions if e.g. a flag is
defined in both use.local.desc and metadata.xml, or some peopl
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:40:36 +0200
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > An clearly motivation explanation that I didn't add, which I'm
> > going to add once I send this is the fact that as per the QA
> > Project, use.local.desc can not contain a USE flag that alrea
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
> metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have
> had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary "tools" to
> documen
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:42 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> There could be also switch to add newline
>> before the message but I can't think of a use for it myself.
>> The question is how to name the switch :) "-n" could be confusing as
>> "echo -n" has the oppo
Joe Peterson wrote:
The comment from Vlastimil about echo not being part of the elog system
is a very valid point indeed. As for how to specify that a newline
should be inserted, I think that using elog switches like "-n", "-p",
etc., as well as putting more than one string on a line present two
I have an strange idea, it will probably get shot down by everyone or
people will point out that it has been discussed and thought it was a
bad idea but anyway...
...why not invite a developer from another distribution to join the council?
I think inviting co-operation from other areas would o
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
I completely agree. Few people have done more behind the scenes as Roy.
I would also like to nominate zmendico for his excellent work with portage.
George
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
George Prowse wrote:
> [stuff]
Take it to gentoo-project, please. This list is s'posed to be for
technical discussion. gentoo-project is more appropriate for this kind
of query.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
Jun 2008 14:21:16 +:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>> > I'd also add two new requirements:
>> > 1. Any appeal must be heard and dec
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have
had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary "t
34 matches
Mail list logo
