Re: [gentoo-dev] VCS repository overview for Gentoo

2008-06-01 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Friday 30 May 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > This is more of a reminder email than anything else, in my capacity > as the VCS administrator for Gentoo. Thanks a lot for the overview, especially the part about public/private repositories. It would be great if this list could be maintained as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On P, 2008-06-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically > the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel > (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Alec Warner
On 01 Jun 2008 05:30:01, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically > the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel > (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about,

[gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole G

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS

2008-06-01 Thread Rémi Cardona
Ulrich Mueller a écrit : Speaking about statistics: Either I have missed it, or so far nobody has presented any solid numbers showing what the benefit of --as-needed in terms of memory usage or program startup time is. The reduction in startup time may not be noticeable. The real win is when l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Raúl Porcel
Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package which is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that arch? IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an user of that arch requests it. K

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200 Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch > keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package > which is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that arch? Yes. Last time I loo

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-06-01 23h59 UTC

2008-06-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-01 23h59 UTC. Removals: media-sound/gtkguitune 2008-05-27 12:52:48 drac media-sound/playspc_gtk 2008-05-27 12:52:49 drac media-sound/yconsole

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Richard Freeman
Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200 Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an user of that arch requests it. Keywording something if an user of said arch doesn't request it, is a waste of resources. How is making