Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: Retiring...

2008-05-14 Thread Daniel Drake
Carlos Silva wrote: I'm really sorry to leave you guys but my current life isn't compatible with working on Gentoo. Live is too busy to give Gentoo the time it deserves. I really liked to work with all of you. I'll try to contribute as much as possible via bugzzie. If anyone need any kind of help

[gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-14 Thread Albert Zeyer
Hi! Jan Kundrát said this topic belongs to the mailinglist. You can find the related bug-report here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221967 Content: >From the name of the USE-flag, you could expect different things: 1. It stands for 'dedicated server', which would mean, that this USE-f

[gentoo-dev] Re: LaTeX documentation

2008-05-14 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Andrey Grozin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > By the way, while investigating this question, I found quite a few > packages which still depend on virtual/tetex, while, probably, > virtual/latex-base would be better (in some of them, the USE flag > tetex then should become latex). Some suspects are:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug wrangling

2008-05-14 Thread Steve Long
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would it be possible to add the tree categories as products and the >> packages as components thereof? > > It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task > though, as it requires two confi

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-05-14 Thread Steve Long
server -- never did get a rational explanation of what it breaks. and now USE defaults work there's simply no excuse imo. I note openldap in 2008.0 profile uses minimal which has *always* been acknowledged as the wrong way to build a client installation, despite its long-standing use in mysql. --

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug wrangling

2008-05-14 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task >> though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that >> happens often enough. >> > Shouldn't that just be scripted via pybugz? A GUI for that would be nice; > perhaps

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug wrangling

2008-05-14 Thread Steve Long
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task >>> though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that >>> happens often enough. >>> >> Shouldn't that just be scripted via pybu