Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some > eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle. must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some > > eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle. > > must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qemu -> add gcc-3.x dependency

2008-05-10 Thread Steve Long
Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Code may look like this: > > # get last one of sorted list > for t in $(ls -1 /usr/bin/gcc-3*|sort); do use teh globs, luke ;) for t in /usr/bin/gcc-3*; do # will already do this, sorting according to LC_COLLATE order (set to C or POSIX [same thing] for ebuild.) There'

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/moreutils: moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest

2008-05-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
"Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Added:moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest > Log: > initial ebuild for the moreutils package > src_unpack() { > unpack ${A} > cd "${WORKDIR}/moreutils" > epatch "${FILESDIR}/docbook-makefile.patch" > }

[gentoo-dev] Re: preserving mtimes

2008-05-10 Thread Steve Long
Zac Medico wrote: > It's currently possible for ebuilds to call the insopts, diropts, > exeopts, and libopts functions to modify these variables. If they > add the -p option, then timestamps will be preserved. I suppose we > can add -p to the default options if that's what everybody wants. > Gets

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qemu -> add gcc-3.x dependency

2008-05-10 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Samstag, 10. Mai 2008, Steve Long wrote: > Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > > Code may look like this: > > > > # get last one of sorted list > > for t in $(ls -1 /usr/bin/gcc-3*|sort); do > > use teh globs, luke ;) > for t in /usr/bin/gcc-3*; do # will already do this, sorting according to > LC_COLL

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some > > > eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle. > > > > must have be

[gentoo-dev] Re: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008

2008-05-10 Thread Duncan
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 08 May 2008 16:33:28 -0700: > Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The complete log will > show up at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ shortly. FWIW, the log entry at the URL above is still

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo

2008-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10 May 2008) # xemacs-packages-sumo cannot be installed together with any of the separate # xemacs packages. Please use xemacs-packages-all instead to install all # xemacs packages. See bug 23949. app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo I'm quite happy to close a bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new 'virtualization' project or herd

2008-05-10 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tiziano Müller wrote: | Hi everyone | | What do you think of creating a new 'virtualization' project or herd/team? Sounds like a good idea, there seem to be enough packages to warrant it. ~ Especially if you're finding shared packages and space for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: preserving mtimes

2008-05-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Long wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: >> It's currently possible for ebuilds to call the insopts, diropts, >> exeopts, and libopts functions to modify these variables. If they >> add the -p option, then timestamps will be preserved. I suppose we >> can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008

2008-05-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:54 Sat 10 May , Duncan wrote: > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Thu, 08 May 2008 16:33:28 -0700: > > > Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The complete log will > > show up at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ shortl

[gentoo-dev] Re: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008

2008-05-10 Thread Duncan
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 10 May 2008 12:42:38 -0700: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cci "Rename log to correct name (.txt instead of .log). > Reported by Duncan." Thanks. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfre

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/moreutils: moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest

2008-05-10 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:50:24AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > "Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Added:moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest > > Log: > > initial ebuild for the moreutils package > > src_unpack() { > > unpack ${A} > >