[gentoo-dev] Upcoming infra work - Bugzilla, CVS/SVN/Git

2008-05-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi folks, Hopefully sometime THIS weekend, I'll be moving Bugzilla as well at our VCS services (CVS/SVN/Git on stork.gentoo.org) to new machines. I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downtimes are going to be minimal, as the flips will be near-live. -- Robin Hugh Johnson

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-02 Thread Luca Barbato
Enrico Weigelt wrote: My suggestion: make those language bindings being separate packages. So, other packages can depend on them directly, instead of the current, build-breaking hack. I'm not advocating gentoo should do this step alone, but instead join in the upstream and solve it there. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic dependencies in gegl

2008-05-02 Thread Luca Barbato
Hanno Böck wrote: Now, gegl has 13 optional dependencies that could be use-flagged. The pity is, it has no configure-option for most of them, they are autodetected. (It's about gtk, ruby, lua, cairo, pango, libpng, openexr, rsvg, sdl, asciidoc, enscript, graphviz and ffmpeg) whoah! Quite a lar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic dependencies in gegl

2008-05-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Hanno Böck a écrit : Recently, GIMP got it's first development version based on gegl. Sweet :) Is there some brave gentoo dev (or non-dev, doesn't really matter) volunteering to send patches to gegl-upstream? I would really like to say that I can do it for you, but I'm very time limited, s

[gentoo-dev] Re: Hackontest

2008-05-02 Thread Duncan
Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 02 May 2008 11:40:06 +0530: > I added the Gentoo project to Hackontest (for more information, visit > http://hackontest.org/) . Cool! I'd read about it and wondered if Gentoo would be participating, so it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic dependencies in gegl

2008-05-02 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi, > >Now, gegl has 13 optional dependencies that could be use-flagged. The pity > >is, it has no configure-option for most of them, they are autodetected. A good example for miserable design ;-P That's why I everything should be entirely built in sy

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-02 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >My suggestion: make those language bindings being separate > >packages. So, other packages can depend on them directly, > >instead of the current, build-breaking hack. > > > >I'm not advocating gentoo should do this step alone,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Enrico Weigelt a écrit : * Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Enrico Weigelt wrote: My suggestion: make those language bindings being separate packages. So, other packages can depend on them directly, instead of the current, build-breaking hack. I'm not advocating gentoo should do thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-02 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Best example on how to do that is gstreamer. All the plugins come in 3 > tarballs but each can be built individually. Really clean. ACK. That's how it always should be. All my own packages also work this way - ev'ry thing else doesnt get released ;-P

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic dependencies in gegl

2008-05-02 Thread Luca Barbato
Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi, Now, gegl has 13 optional dependencies that could be use-flagged. The pity is, it has no configure-option for most of them, they are autodetected. A good example for miserable design ;-P That's why I everything should be e

[gentoo-dev] Re: Hackontest

2008-05-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
Anant Narayanan wrote: > Hi, > > I added the Gentoo project to Hackontest (for more information, visit > http://hackontest.org/) . Developers and users are invited to add feature > requests for Gentoo (preferably with links to bugzilla :-)). Hopefully, > some of us developers can get together and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-02 Thread Jan Kundrát
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Maybe you remember the discussions about stable vs. dev kernel > branches: the kernel folks wanted to give up stable branches, > leaving them to the individual distros and concentrate just on > devel branch. A lot of people were totally unhappy with this > idea, so they abo