# David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22 Apr 2008)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. (bug #208878)
# Dropping conky-syntax in favour of upstream syntax script.
# Please enable the vim-syntax flag for conky instead.
app-vim/conky-syntax
--
David Shakaryan
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing lis
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:43:08 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree that RDEPEND should likely be installed prior to
> pkg_preinst to satisfy the dependency. After all, PDEPEND is "good
> enough" for doing packages that aren't required at
> pkg_preinst/pkg_postinst.
It'
Hi folks,
I've decided to retire as a Gentoo dev.
I've been a dev for almost exactly 3 years as part of the Haskell team.
I was team leader for a year or so. I managed to recruit kolmodin a
couple years ago and handed team leadership over to him a few months
ago. It's now his turn to recruit some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya Duncs,
Sorry to hear your time constraints have gotten the better of you
finally. Best of luck with well-typed, I hope it proves interesting and
that you bring much Haskelly joy to the world... 5;)
Mike 5:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:34:30 +0200
"Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Apr 2008)
> > # Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't build
> > # wrt bug 178036 and ha
All,
As per discussions with Guy Martin (gmsoft), the hppa/2006.1 profile has
been marked as deprecated and will be removed in 30 days time.
--
Doug Goldstein
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:22:14 +0100
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks especially to the arch teams for all the time they put in for
> us in testing and stabilising Haskell packages on such a wide range
> of platforms. I feel I should also apologise to jer for constantly
> breaking g
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 08:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > We definitely don't want to install DEPEND at the pkg_* stages, so I'd
> > say the requirement there, if you're asking, is prior to src_*, if
> > that matters.
>
> If the alternatives are not being able to install from a binary at all
>
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:38:06 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Every package dependency in DEPEND is installed and usable before
src_unpack starts, right? So is the question here whether or not they
can be uninstalled right before pkg_{pre,post}
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:45:13 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd go with RDEPEND only. Any other interpretation results in
installing build-time-only packages along with a binpkg, which
doesn't seem to make sense.
That's definitely not what we wa
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:02:29 +0100
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry to get technical but how difficult is it really to change USE
>> flag names? I appreciate that users are out of sync yadda yadda, but
>> could this kind of thing not be considered out of b
11 matches
Mail list logo
