On 07:13 Tue 05 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:05:18 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What happens if the make process changes directories?
>
> In a different process? It's pretty unlikely make will ever become a
> shell builtin...
You're absolutely
The KDE list was created to be used in a near future for patches and
so on, but the moment is not ripe yet. Once we need it, we'll contact
you or fill in a bug to regain RW access.
Thanks :)
On Feb 4, 2008 11:51 PM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:38:57PM
On Feb 5, 2008 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heath N. Caldwell wrote:
> > On 2008-02-04 14:51, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> Can someone provide a tool that given a package name simply prints the
> >> category or cat/pkg, or if ambiguous, prints the multiple cat/pkgs or
> >> returns an er
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:43:55 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will let package managers use a format other than VDB. A well
> > designed replacement can shave a minute off cold cache command
> > times.
>
> How much gain can be expected?
There're two common operations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * Modify built_with_use so that it calls native_built_with_use if such
> a function exists, and falls back to its own implementation otherwise.
>
> * Allow package managers that implement native_built_with_use to sandbox
> off
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 08:54 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/getting-involved.xml
> >
> Maybe could we get it moved on the top level?
Sure, there is some Java specific stuff in there. Likely need to remove
that first, but is a pret
Zac Medico wrote:
If the package manager exposes a slightly lower level interface to
the USE flags then build_with_use can use that instead, and the
package manager won't have to implement the full build_with_use
interface. For example, portageq currently supports a "metadata"
command that can b
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
Incidentally, if anyone is still thinking that built_with_use is
fine... It doesn't handle IUSE defaults, which means package managers
have to store a hacked version of IUSE in VDB for EAPI 1. This isn't
documented anywhere and is highly unobvious.
I don't understan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> If the package manager exposes a slightly lower level interface to
>> the USE flags then build_with_use can use that instead, and the
>> package manager won't have to implement the full build_with_use
>> in
