Denis Dupeyron schrieb:
> I would like to thank Markus Ullmann (jokey) for taking over the
> mentoring of Richard after his original mentor left us.
>
> So please everybody, give a warm welcome to Richard.
>
> Denis.
Now that you did your first commmits, welcome to the crowd of evil tree
breaker
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell
> me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only
> relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. What is the
> use case for expor
On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's no particular reason that new
> version formats can't be introduced in a new EAPI so long as the
> version strings don't appear in ebuilds using older EAPIs or in
> profiles. Ditto for naming rules.
>
Errr... so should
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:25:13 +0100
"Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's no particular reason that new
> > version formats can't be introduced in a new EAPI so long as the
> > version strings don't appear in
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:26:27 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager has
> > to export to an ebuild/eclass. That includes syntax and semantics
> > of exported and expected functions and variables (IOW th
On Dec 28, 2007 1:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:25:13 +0100
> "Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's no particular reason that new
> > > version formats can'
As previously announced apache-2.0 support ends as of 31-12-2007 and will be
masked (together with apr{,-util}-0*) end of january.
A tracker bug exists at https://bugs.gentoo.org/203578
Greets,
Bene
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 05:53 +, Steve Long wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> >> branding: Enable Gentoo specific branding
> >> [questionable, as used for splashes/shortcuts/artwork]
> >
> > Well, my personal opinion here is that we should enable this by default
> > on *at least* the desktop
All,
It's that time of the month again, time for another Bug Day on Saturday
5th January. Yep, that's the first bug day of 2008.
Join us in #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net to help squash some bugs
and meet up with fellow users and developers.
Read all about it http://bugday.gentoo.org/
Regar
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Dec
2007 12:28:10 +:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:25:13 +0100
> "Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2007 1:03 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > There's no particu
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Dec
2007 18:11:33 +:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > Or to put it another way, you're objec
11 matches
Mail list logo
