[gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A near identical copy of emul-libs.eclass, was done for a clean split from the old emul systems. I don't receive mail from this list, so CC me if you want me to see your reply. - -- === Mike Doty

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Mittwoch, 14. November 2007, Josh Saddler wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main > > gentoo.org site. > > But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the > other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote: > S=${WORKDIR} Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too? Kind regards -- Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:13 Wed 14 Nov , Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > Thanks a lot for the great work! > > I'm just wondering how to search for a specific package. Is that possible? Please read the entire FAQ [1] before asking any questions, as Robin said in his original post. Thanks, Donnie 1. http://packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
Thanks a lot for the great work! I'm just wondering how to search for a specific package. Is that possible? On Nov 14, 2007 10:55 AM, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 14. November 2007, Josh Saddler wrote: > > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > There isn't meant to be the big b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
Good point! Thanks. Short packages2 TODO list This is not the comprehensive version of the TODO list. That may be found in the /todo/ directory of the source code. * "Search": match a given string against: a substring in packages names, and description On Nov 14, 2007 11:22 AM, D

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12:46PM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main > > gentoo.org site. > But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the > other parts of the site, as the other pages

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Robin H. Johnson wrote: > After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the > return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete > rewrite. > Great. > > Thanks to everybody that worked on this: > - jokey,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Wednesday 14 of November 2007 11:31:13 Torsten Rehn wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote: > > S=${WORKDIR} > > Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too? No need to quote in assignments. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:58 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the > return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete > rewrite. Yay! It's soo useful for getting an overview and planning what work we need to do nex

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: > On Wednesday 14 of November 2007 11:31:13 Torsten Rehn wrote: >> On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote: >>> S=${WORKDIR} >> Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too? > > No need to quote in assignments. But why is

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Vladimir Rusinov
On 11/14/07, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > But why is it standard to quote other assignments like in DESCRIPTION and > HOMEPAGE then? Probably because WORKDIR would be quoted where it is being used: ... if [[ -d "${S}"/${dir} ]] ; the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 14:21, you wrote: > But why is it standard to quote other assignments like in DESCRIPTION and > HOMEPAGE then? When assigning literal values as in DESCRIPTION and HOMEPAGE, you have to quote. ${WORKDIR} is quoted on its assignment and therefore does not have to be q

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 14:53 +0100, Torsten Rehn wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 14:21, you wrote: > > But why is it standard to quote other assignments like in DESCRIPTION and > > HOMEPAGE then? > > When assigning literal values as in DESCRIPTION and HOMEPAGE, you have to > quote. ${WORKDI

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Ferris McCormick wrote: > Note, however, that for example in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh, it's > always quoted (except once, which looks like an oversight). I was talking about referencing variables when declaring other variables. Whenever you actually use a vari

[gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Ryan Hill
Ferris McCormick wrote: > (The line that looks like an oversight is: > > ebuild.sh:1019: if [[ ${PORTAGE_BUILDDIR}/.compiled -nt ${WORKDIR} ]] ; > then > ) you don't need to quotes when referencing variables inside [[ double brackets ]], but you do in [ single brackets ]. confused yet? ;) --

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Rehn wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 14:21, you wrote: >> But why is it standard to quote other assignments like in DESCRIPTION and >> HOMEPAGE then? > > When assigning literal values as in DESCRIPTION and HOMEPAGE, you have to > quote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Anant Narayanan
> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the > other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the > top)? Right now there's zero integration with the gentoo.org site, and > even the old p.g.o had at least minimal integration with the other parts > of

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:58:24PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Thanks to everybody that worked on this: > - jokey, starting this version > - cla, the visual template for this version > - robbat2, way too much coding and infra wrangling You guys rock! Thanks for bringing packages.g.o back :-)

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Bruno
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:58:24 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the > return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete > rewrite. > > If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for > the

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Joe Peterson
(Sorry for the previous reply to announce..) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libevent: ChangeLog libevent-1.3e.ebuild

2007-11-14 Thread Jan Kundrát
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > So on estonian locales those letters won't be included in [a-z] but > they will be included in [:alpha:]. Actually that was exactly my point. If user had some funny locale that has digits or dots in its [:alpha:], the ebuild wouldn't work as desired, but it would rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Joe Peterson
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the > return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete > rewrite. Great! Glad to see it back; thanks for the hard work! And hey, fbsd is now considered "exotic"! I kinda like the ring

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12:46PM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote: >> Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main >>> gentoo.org site. >> But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the >> other parts of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libevent: ChangeLog libevent-1.3e.ebuild

2007-11-14 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 21:37:46 Jan Kundrát wrote: > Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > > So on estonian locales those letters won't be included in [a-z] but > > they will be included in [:alpha:]. > > Actually that was exactly my point. If user had some funny locale that > has digits or dots in it

[gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Markus Ullmann
Joe Peterson schrieb: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > One idea for improvement, however, might be to spell the archs > veritcally, thereby easily letting all archs be viewable across one page > (even perhaps by default). It would help to boast our many arch support. Heh, well I think the devs are use

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Bruno wrote: > E.g when looking at categories only the first 'n' items are show and there is > no mention on the total count. > At a minimum it should display something like: >showing packages 1-29 out of 127 > on page bottom with note that page browsi

[gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Ryan Hill
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Having small fonts isn't common, at least not amongst folk that I've > directly observed in usability testing. Having text at sizes that don't > strain the eyes is more common. It doesn't seem unreasonable that the site be readable despite the font size. The logo overlap

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I've been > asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo > without the spotlight effect on the background. What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png o