Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 08:58 Mon 12 Nov , Aniruddha wrote:
>
>> I am interested in resurrecting the 'seeds' project (
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/seeds/ ). I first heard from it when I
>> announced my stage 4 project (
>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-610904-highlight-.html
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:13:32 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Use of ((EUID)) is also quicker.
> >
> > Quicker than what?
>
> Than [[ ${UID} -ne 0 ]] ie the existing code. What did you think the
> discussion was about?
Well, I was kind of wondering... Because it looked to me like
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:26:46 +0100
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly is the difference between this valid situation and the
> previous invalid one?
It's basically down to whether pkg_setup has to be run with the same
system state as pkg_preinst / pkg_postinst. If
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:13:32 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use of ((EUID)) is also quicker.
Quicker than what?
Than [[ ${UID} -ne 0 ]] ie the existing code. What did you think the
discussion was about?
Well, I was kind of wondering
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:13:52 -0500
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mind taking this off list? As much fun as it is to see two people
> run around in circles blindfolded with pointy sticks, It really
> doesn't belong here.
Would you mind not needlessly quoting ~9KB of text, next time?
Thanks! :)
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been wanting a GUI for eselect lately, so tonight I hacked up the
> start of one called eselect_zenity [1]. It only works for the most
> trivial modules so far -- it has to parse eselect output, so special
> parsers need to be written for each type. ese
Doug Klima schrieb:
> While I haven't had much time to work on the bits, Gentopia does contain
> PolicyKit (though the 0.7 snapshots that appear do have some issues and
> you should stick to the 0.6 series). It's hopefully going to be the way
> forward for Gentoo to use PolicyKit. As many may know,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 21:01 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I plan to make the java eclasses use the EAPI 1
Any chance we can *at least* wait until we have a release out the door
that has a portage version which supports these features *before* we
start trying to use them in the tree? Our general ru
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:22:03 -0800
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance we can *at least* wait until we have a release out the door
> that has a portage version which supports these features *before* we
> start trying to use them in the tree? Our general rule was to not use
> f
Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Doug Klima schrieb:
>
>> While I haven't had much time to work on the bits, Gentopia does contain
>> PolicyKit (though the 0.7 snapshots that appear do have some issues and
>> you should stick to the 0.6 series). It's hopefully going to be the way
>> forward for Gentoo to
On 16:06 Tue 13 Nov , Raul Porcel (armin76) wrote:
> 1.1 app-text/notecase/notecase-1.7.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-text/notecase/notecase-1.7.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x8
On 20:22 Tue 13 Nov , Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Doug Klima schrieb:
> > While I haven't had much time to work on the bits, Gentopia does contain
> > PolicyKit (though the 0.7 snapshots that appear do have some issues and
> > you should stick to the 0.6 series). It's hopefully going to be the way
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I'd like to talk in more detail about this with someone, but nobody on
> #gentoo-guis seemed to know why PackageKit wouldn't work for the simple
> (no USE flag changes) case. Should I try the -guis mailing list instead?
Looking at the current feature set of PackageKit, t
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> if [[ -n "${ver}" ]] && [[ ${ver//[a-zA-Z-]} != "${PV//[a-zA-Z]}" ]] ;
>>> then
>>
>> It isn't terribly likely to become an issue here, but it might be nicer
>> to use [[:alpha:]] than [a-zA-Z].
>
> Is [[:alpha:]] locale-safe?
>
Yes, all POSIX char
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 20:31 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> That was only the case because previously, using new features that
> Portage didn't support would cause horrible breakage. Now, instead, the
> ebuilds show up as being masked.
...which is just as good as "broken" when it happens to a new
Steve Long wrote:
>> Is [[:alpha:]] locale-safe?
>>
> Yes, all POSIX character classes listed here are:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap07.html
Thanks for a nice link. If I read section 7.3.1 correctly, [[:alpha:]]
always contains those letters, but might contain m
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:17:59 -0800
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 20:31 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > That was only the case because previously, using new features that
> > Portage didn't support would cause horrible breakage. Now, instead,
> > the ebuilds s
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:39:50 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Read it (and my explanation of it earlier in the thread) until you
> understand it. There is nothing consistent in what I'm saying.
...bleh. *in*consistent.
NNeee oe...
--
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 21:01 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I plan to make the java eclasses use the EAPI 1
>
> Any chance we can *at least* wait until we have a release out the door
> that has a portage version which supports these features *before* we
> start trying t
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 00:39 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Umm... So in the paragraph above, you say an EAPI-specific eclass
> > isn't a good idea, and here you push it as the proposed solution.
> > Huh? Consistency, please...
>
> Read it (and my explanation of it earlier in the thread) until y
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:25:44 -0800
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > EAPI *can't* be set in an eclass correctly anyway because EAPI is
> > allowed to (and likely will in the future) change the behaviour of
> > inherit.
>
> ...and this proves my point. Rather than simply stating this
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> ...which is just as good as "broken" when it happens to a new user
>> first installing Gentoo and wondering why he can't even follow the
>> directions in the Handbook.
>
> ...so you just ensure that the handbook tells the user to upgrade the
> package manager as quickly a
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 01:33:54 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
> >> Is [[:alpha:]] locale-safe?
> >
> > Yes, all POSIX character classes listed here are:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap07.html
>
> Thanks for a nice link. If I read section 7.3.1 cor
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
'/packages/?category=media-sou
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
Yay! Nice work guys.
> Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
> http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
Does
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:14:57PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
> Does this count as a rendering bug? Seems to be missing the
> black/purple banner bit.
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dirtyepic/misc/pgologo.png
No
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:14:57 -0600:
>> Please read the entire FAQ before asking any questions!
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/faq/
>
> Does this count as a rendering bug? Seems to be missing the
> black/purple banner bit.
>
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
> gentoo.org site.
But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
top)? Right now there's zero integration w
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
>>> Is [[:alpha:]] locale-safe?
>>>
>> Yes, all POSIX character classes listed here are:
>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap07.html
>
> Thanks for a nice link. If I read section 7.3.1 correctly, [[:alpha:]]
> always contains th
29 matches
Mail list logo
