* Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/09/27 15:11 -0700]:
> Go and read ALL of this bug:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108944
> Pylon and myself, as folk in favour of CA-Cert tried to get the ball
> rolling to get Organization-level certs from CACert. It seems to have
> long blocked
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:10:48 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
> > considered? Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they
> > offer the same free type of certificate to open source projects just like
> > cacert,
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:10:48 -0700:
> If there aren't too many AND we can get a dedicated IP for each of those
> services, I'd like to suggest the following, as an easily doable and
> low-overhead (in terms of Trust
On Tuesday, 21. August 2007 14:23:44 Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> # Wulf C. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Aug 2007)
> # Stable version doesn't compile, unstable version is partly broken.
> # Application is conceptionally wrong. More details on bug 187251.
> # Use app-cdr/koverartist instead.
> # Mask
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:31:24AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Would it be possible to setup a gentoo-certs package, versioned like any
> other, with USE flags if necessary for installing where various browsers,
> etc can see them?
That fails/makes-it-complicated for somebody accessing the Gentoo SSL
It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL" header at
the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of that, robbat2,
KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed to filter that new
message out of bugzie emails.
This has not actually
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because
of that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that
uses sed to filter that new message out of bugzie emails.
On 15:35 Thu 27 Sep , Steve Dibb (beandog) wrote:
> beandog 07/09/27 15:35:24
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:mplayer-1.0_rc1_p20070927.ebuild
> Log:
> Subversion bump, install a52 by default with dvd use flag, switch xvmc
> linking back to generic lib
On 20:13 Thu 27 Sep , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote:
> betelgeuse07/09/27 20:13:33
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:java-gnome-4.0.4.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump for bug #193951.
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
> 1.1 dev-java/java-gnome
On 23:10 Fri 28 Sep , Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote:
> zmedico 07/09/28 23:10:10
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:portage-2.1.3.11.ebuild
> Removed: portage-2.1.3.10.ebuild
> Log:
> 2.1.3.11 bump. This fixes bugs #192706, #193548, and #194081.
On 00:23 Sat 29 Sep , Olivier Crete (tester) wrote:
> 1.1 app-misc/supercat/supercat-0.5.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-misc/supercat/supercat-0.5.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:45:41 -0700:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:31:24AM +, Duncan wrote:
>> Would it be possible to setup a gentoo-certs package, versioned like
>> any other, with USE flags if necessary for ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> You deleted a huge chunk of the ChangeLog. Might want to check for bugs
> in whatever tool you're using.
That was intentional pruning since the ChangeLog was growing rather
large. Next time I'll do a separate comment and/or
13 matches
Mail list logo
