[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Steve Long
Jeff Rollin wrote: > On 10/03/07, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that >> > are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes >> > (definitely a bad thing). .. > OTOH, I don't see how the allegation that peo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:15:56 + Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You wouldn't even be allowed to carry on like that on the forums; why > should we users be held up to a higher standard of conduct than devs > who sign up to represent gentoo? You really have no idea what's considered perfe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:15:56 + Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW it > wasn't the nature of the insult, it was just that there was an insult > at all I didn't see one. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 11/03/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 22:52 +, Jeff Rollin wrote: > Personally I find "you are/he/she/it/x,y,z is gay" statements/jokes > really lame. The topic matter doesn't seem to be relevant to anything > (beyond whom you might want to sleep with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 11/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: > On 10/03/07, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that >> > are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes >> > (definitely a bad thin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:34:41 + "Jeff Rollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? Excuse me, but as I tried to indicate in another message, I'm as > much on YOUR side as anyone else's. Then stop continuing the thread. Everyone stop continuing the thread. It's over. Dead. Gone. Etc. -- gentoo-de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Dan Meltzer
This thread is gay. On 3/11/07, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:34:41 + "Jeff Rollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? Excuse me, but as I tried to indicate in another message, I'm as > much on YOUR side as anyone else's. Then stop continuing the thread.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Dan Meltzer wrote: This thread is gay. Well played. -- Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Thomas Rösner
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: You really have no idea what's considered perfectly acceptable on the forums, do you? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-1053530.html#1053530 <-- acceptable Now *that's* satire. See, on forums you can retract what you said (if you don't get quoted, that is),

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:15:56 + Steve Long > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You wouldn't even be allowed to carry on like that on the forums; why >> should we users be held up to a higher standard of conduct than devs >> who sign up to represent gentoo? > > You really ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:11:53 + Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-1053530.html#1053530 <-- > > acceptable > > > Um, that was in Off The Wall, which is known to be a bit.. er, off > the wall? > > And idiotic as that post was, he wasn't directing his

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Jakub Moc
[snip] __ __ _ _ ___ _ |__ / _ \| \/ |/ ___| | / ___|_ _/ _ \| _ \| | / / | | | |\/| | | _| | \___ \ | || | | | |_) | | / /| |_| | | | | |_| |_| ___) || || |_| | __/|_| /\___/|_| |_|\(_) |/ |_| \___/|_| (_) *everyone* please stop fl

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/aria

2007-03-11 Thread Raúl Porcel
# Raúl Porcel (11 Mar 2007) # Mask for removal in 60 days, for treecleaners # Bug 153355, use net-misc/aria2 net-misc/aria -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:24:49 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > __ __ _ _ ___ _ > |__ / _ \| \/ |/ ___| | / ___|_ _/ _ \| _ \| | > / / | | | |\/| | | _| | \___ \ | || | | | |_) | | > / /| |_| | | | | |_| |_| ___) || || |_| | __/|_| > /

[gentoo-dev] Appropriate discussions for this forum (was Re: Something positive!)

2007-03-11 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Um, that was in Off The Wall, which is known to be a bit.. er, off >> the wall? >> >> And idiotic as that post was, he wasn't directing his idiocy at >> another user. (I didn't read the whole thread, admittedly, nor am I >> about to.) > > You mean, he was offending whol

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-11 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 11/03/07, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:24:49 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > __ __ _ _ ___ _ > |__ / _ \| \/ |/ ___| | / ___|_ _/ _ \| _ \| | > / / | | | |\/| | | _| | \___ \ | || | | | |_) | | >

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-03-11 23h59 UTC

2007-03-11 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-03-11 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-ruby/ruby-gtk 2007-03-05 06:19:15 tester x11-themes/qtcurve 2007-03-05 15:57:50 beandog net-libs/gecko-sdk 2