"Rob C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a new Gentoo developer but I have worked on a number of other small
> projects. This list is a disgrace and most flames are nothing but
> showboating. If you have an issue then deal with it directly with whomever
> is causing the problem.
Dealing it who cau
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:46:47AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>>> And you come here to tell us that people shouldn't get confused by these
>>> 'very few' retirements, that the sun in still shining nicely and we are
>>> recruiting people as always? And
Stuart Longland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Gentoo Foundation) wrote:
> How's this for an idea though... Rather than banning *people*... why
> not temporarily ban a thread? I know this is easily possible on forum
> threads -- mailing lists are more difficult, but if one could lock a
> thread for a
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> emacs-w3 - Add support for Emacs/W3 where applicable
>>
>
> No. Removed.
>
> V-Li
>
Die emacs! :D
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Die vim! :-D
2007/3/6, Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Piotr JaroszyÅski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> emacs-w3 - Add support for Emacs/W3 where applicable
>>
>
> No. Removed.
>
> V-Li
>
Die emacs! :D
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Joao Emanuel
C
Joao Emanuel wrote:
> Die vim! :-D
Real programmers use cat > filename :-}
Btw i think the dead keywords can die
--
Timothy `Drizzt` Redaelli - http://dev.gentoo.org/~drizzt/
FreeSBIE Developer, Gentoo Developer, GUFI Staff
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We
Hi,
If you have a long lingering mask in package.mask, please consider cleaning it
up.
If you blocked something for testing 2+ years ago and it's still like that,
maybe
it's time to consider bumping the package, removing it, or more?
If it still needs to be tested more, can you add a new update
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:45:25 +1000
Stuart Longland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a somewhat related note... I've sat back and watched this
> argument for some time now. Banning people seems like an extremely
> drastic measure. Sure, it's easy. It's also easily circumvented,
> and is onl
Hello Gentelmen,
I wanted to cover two things. I'm setting up a conference in Chicago
called Flourish, I've included the main email I forwarded to other lists at
the bottom of this email, I was wondering if gentoo wanted to be represented
or make an appearance at the event. I'm not sure where
Can someone point me to the documentation regarding "If it's possible to create
either a dynamic or static library, you should create both." (paraphrase of
something vapier said at one point many moons ago, but I'm not trying to hold
mike against that). I ask because I sense a new release of perl l
the very latest linux-headers package no longer installs asm/page.h ... this
will (and is) causing trouble for many packages
no, the answer is not any of the following:
- start installing asm/page.h again
- screw with /usr/src/linux/include/asm/page.h
- patch asm/page.h internally
the solutio
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Mike Kelly wrote:
> My glep 27 implementation is essentially complete, though without
> making some changes to PAM and shadow, it won't really function for
> ROOT!=/ with a GNU userland. Because of this, I don't really deem it
> ready for general use yet.
i dont think pam
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> No, it's that you're dead set on derailing it and being as unhelpful as
> possible. You have absolutely nothing to contribute, as evidenced by
> every previous time you've gotten involved with anything I've done, and
> given how badly you tried to
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Can someone point me to the documentation regarding "If it's possible to
> create either a dynamic or static library, you should create both."
> (paraphrase of something vapier said at one point many moons ago, but I'm
> not trying to hold mike ag
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> Dňa Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:46:35 -0700
>
> "Daniel Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> > On 3/3/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why is it a developer-only privilege? You just made that up.
> >
> > To co-lead a Gentoo project? You
sci-electronics/modelsim needs its Manifest to be regenerated in
Manifest2 format and I don't have access to the necessary tarballs to
do so. Does anybody out here have access to a modelsim license or
installation ? I used to, quite some time ago, but not anymore. If you
do, please contact me off-
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:17:46 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Michael Cummings wrote:
> i dont think this has really been documented properly, but the logic
> behind it is pretty simple ...
>
> not providing static libraries and only providing dynamic lib
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Daniel Robbins wrote:
> > 1) Any material created by Gentoo developers, as part of an official
> > Gentoo Project, needs to have copyright assigned to the Gentoo
> > Foundation, whether or not it is currently included in the Portage
> > tree. This
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Hubert Mercier wrote:
> > That's probably why it is so hard to renew developer pool.
>
> Why do people keep repeating this myth? As kloeri pointed out,
> developer base keeps growing constantly.
Which is a problem, because the growth with
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:27:00 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That remainst to be debateable. It is however also true that he is a
> party with a vested interest in the process. As such we must be warry
> of what we allow.
Everyone involved has a vested interest. If they weren't i
Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Tue Mar 06 2007, 02:27:00PM CST]
> That remainst to be debateable. It is however also true that he is a party
> with a vested interest in the process. As such we must be warry of what we
> allow.
I think you (and many others, including drobbins) have missed something
impor
21 matches
Mail list logo
