On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:35:17 +0200 Christian Birchinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote:
> > Unfortunatelly this is something different. xmm-pipe lets you
> > control running xmms from commandline (thus binding these commands
> > to ke
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:03:16 +0100 Luis Medinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like we have volunteers to maintain xmms for a couple of
> years. I offered a good solution but looks like nobody likes
> it. I'm still open for sugestions. But keep xmms on the future sound
> herd overlay it's th
On Sunday 27 August 2006 04:11, Robert Cernansky wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:03:16 +0100 Luis Medinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds like we have volunteers to maintain xmms for a couple of
> > years. I offered a good solution but looks like nobody likes
> > it. I'm still open for suges
On 2006.08.24 01:17, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I just posted this to my blog [1], but I know you don't all read it so
I
wanted to post it here as well. Do read all the way through. I very
rarely write anything this long, and when I do, it's something I feel
very strongly about.
I started my fourth
Robert Cernansky wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:34:27 +0200 Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:42:27 +0200
>> Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> mpd (and xmms2) is just a server that is responsible for music playback,
>> functionality such as
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:46:32 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| My answer to this ENTIRE thread is to STOP wasting time complaining,
| whining and nagging and write the code.
Very good solution for the problem that two thirds of the time spent
coding is spent fixing other people's m
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:46:32 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | My answer to this ENTIRE thread is to STOP wasting time complaining,
> | whining and nagging and write the code.
>
> Very good solution for the problem that two thirds of the time spent
> co
Roy Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:28:04 +0100:
> I think the problem(s) stem from the way Gentoo is organised now. I'm
> sure you will shoot me down if I'm wrong. In summary. Gentoo is a loose
> knit group of packages with individual
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 27 Aug
2006 04:26:07 -0400:
> On Sunday 27 August 2006 04:11, Robert Cernansky wrote:
>>
>> If [xmms] will be in sound overlay, will be somehow, let's say
>> minimally supported? By who?
>
> if it's a bug in xm
Just a reminder that GCC 4.1 will be going stable on x86 and amd64 very
shortly (according to GWN at least), and is already stable on PPC. If
you have any bugs blocking bug #140707 [i] please have a look and CC the
relevant arch teams for stabilization. I'll be pinging bugs that
haven't seen
10 matches
Mail list logo
