Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 08/06/06, Jon Portnoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do very much object to using any gentoo.org infrastructure or
subdomains to do so. If someone is going to tackle that, it should be
done outside of Gentoo proper. We don't need to be stuck maintaining and
supporting
Peter wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:51:25 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
First, let me say that I'm approaching this from a user's perspective. I
have no insight or knowledge as to the history of the overlay project or
any of the people involved. I _do_ know that since late 2004 when I first
swi
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/8/06, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the
internet?
The policy for overlays.gentoo.org hosting [1] is hopefully clear: as
the project leads, they're ultimately responsible (and therefo
Starting a new thread here for a new angle...
As Stuart mentioned, bugs for any ebuild on o.g.o would go through
Gentoo bugzilla. It seems like genstef and jokey have completely
ignored support from arch teams for this overlay. What are you
proposing with respect to arch keywords and package.mas
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I finally had a few free cycles, so I fixed up the eselect-compiler
ebuild to better handle the transition from gcc-config and updated
toolchain.eclass to better work with multilib. I've had a bunch of help
from the amd64 devs/testers/users this past week testing it ou
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
