On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Jakub Moc wrote:
I bet there's a bug open for it.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482
. How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent
updates.
The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this.
Also, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
On Apr 7, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
On the other hand, this problem does have a solution--another
level of
indirection. Anybody who wishes, dev or user, could spend time
tracking Gentoo development (through bugs and the mailing lists) and
submit status reports to the GWN.
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -3.1.4 now in portage
Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong.
It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it
without adding yourself as maintainer is no form of maintenance. This is
exac
foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > -3.1.4 now in portage
>
> Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong.
>
> It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it
> without adding yourself as main
On 15/04/06, Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I still say it should be removed in 30 days.
>
> I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained,
> and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one
> if there isn
On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:07, Mark Loeser wrote:
> I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained,
> and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one
> if there isn't anyone to claim responsibility for the package when there
> is a problem.
and it
www-servers/pound is without an active maintainer and has an open security bug
#118541
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118541
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata/herd info and CC yourself on the bug.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Lin
Allen Rohner wrote:
> I am looking to use Gentoo to create a standard x86 environment complete
> with apache and X, but with no gcc or portage on the target machine.
> Additionally, use the same technique to cross-compile to a ppc embedded
> system.
You might take a look at GNAP [1]. I'm not sure
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:06:00AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> dev-libs/openobex-1.2 is now in the tree.
Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable?
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpD05qBotCsV.pgp
Descript
