George Prowse wrote:
> Pick an area to help in and help with it (file bug reports, submit patches,
> comment on mailing lists). If people notice you are working well towards a
> specific area you are far more likely to be mentored. Ask this question to
> a developer in a few months time, one who y
Two ways this one can occur.
Way the first: foo-1.0 has a file in SRC_URI called foo.pdf. Then
foo-1.1 comes along, and has a different foo.pdf.
Way the second: foo-1.0 has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. bar-1.0
also has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2.
To avoid this, ensure that your pa
Hello,
dev-util/glimmer has been package masked. It is a very old gtk+-1 code
editor.
This package will be removed one week from today, March 3rd 2006.
Please respond if you feel it should not be removed.
Thanks,
-John (AllanonJL)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Does someone want to pick up dev-lang/nqc? It's a "C-like compiler for
Lego Mindstorms", and it needs some version bump loving (bug #89257)
and some nasty global scope code replacing.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web
orted packages.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
Herds and people with 5 or more unported packages, and change in # of
packages:
46
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Two ways this one can occur.
Way the first: foo-1.0 has a file in SRC_URI called foo.pdf. Then
foo-1.1 comes along, and has a different foo.pdf.
Way the second: foo-1.0 has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. bar-1.0
also has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2.
To avoid
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
-snip-
> Current offenders shall be receiving bugs shortly, since That Which
> Shall Not Be Named now checks for this.
>
The One Tool To Rule Them All? TOT4A -> TOTAL
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> GTK-based LDAP client. This thing has no maintainer, is broken and dead
> upstream (unmaintained, last release 2+ ago).
>
> If anyone still wants to keep it in portage, see
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122336 for the outstanding issues.
>
> Otherw
