On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:41:06 -0700 Joshua Baergen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| The reasons that this system was chosen were correctness and
| maintainability. Many of these essentially use the good old MIT
| license with various companies' and/or individuals' copyrights at the
| top, as you have
On Saturday 21 January 2006 09:08, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Were that the case, we'd do as Debian do and distribute a licence with
> every single package.
I bet there're more than a few ebuilds where this isn't the case. You can't
even blame anyone, since there's no proper licence section in the
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 08:32:20AM +0100, sanchan wrote:
> And it is easier to add in rsync_exclude if you don't want it...
> But it seems that there is no much consensus for the new category.
> Tomorrow I've planned the final tests on tos-1.1.15 and nesc-1.2.1 that will
> be
> added to dev-embedd
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
So you propose we go through and change every package in the tree that
uses BSD or MIT (or GPL with the copyright disclaimer)?
I propose that we decide on the correct way of doing things first, then
decide a plan of action from that. And that includes an opinion from
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:53:53 -0700 Joshua Baergen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > So you propose we go through and change every package in the tree
| > that uses BSD or MIT (or GPL with the copyright disclaimer)?
|
| I propose that we decide on the correct way of doing thing
list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060121
Herds and individuals with 10 or more unported packages:
196 games
139 (no metadata)
120 none (individual maintainer)
91 desktop-dock
49 cjk
43 gnustep
36 desktop-wm
32 s
Hi,
The minutes of the PHP Herd's January meeting are now available [1],
including a full log [2] if anyone needs it.
We elected herd leads, agreed on how to deal with the old-style PHP
packages and discussed a number of ideas like SLOTing of PHP minor
version and some eclass changes, amongst oth
Hello gentooers,
I have gtk-sharp-2.4 emerged, but when I build beagle-0.2.0, the following errors occurred.
How can I solve it?
btw, how to make a new ebuild file? I do the md5sum and so and change Manifest all by hand...
checking for BEAGLE_UI... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk-
Linux Java <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> How can I solve it?
...
> !!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to
> bugs.gentoo.org:
> !!! /var/tmp/portage/beagle-0.2.0/work/beagle-0.2.0/config.log
I would suggest searching Bugzilla or the forums, or asking on the
gentoo-user lis
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 15:32 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 196 games
We know that we have a *lot* of packages to fix on this. I'm working on
it in my spare time between doing release building. Anyway, I did
manage to get about 8 ported, thanks to a single user posting lots of
patches.
Any
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
- we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds "debug-build" to
FEATURES
IMO this is pointless and redundant.
But otherwise the proposal looks good.
Marius
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Luca Longinotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> We elected herd leads, agreed on how to deal with the old-style PHP
> packages
Please don't move the old-style PHP packages back to ~arch. That's just
silly. p.mask them when you want to make people transition.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (
12 matches
Mail list logo
