On Thursday 27 October 2005 02:15, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > I agree here. If you don't want packages to be pulled in because of
> > header files, you need support for that (perhaps in the form of
> > subpackages, or a useflag). But IF the header files of a package are
> > ins
On Thu, 2005-27-10 at 09:36 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 02:15, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > In the case of embedded it is clear that what in binary distributions
> > > is part of the development package (.la files, static libraries,
> > > header
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 09:40 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-27-10 at 09:36 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 October 2005 02:15, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > > In the case of embedded it is clear that what in binary distributions
> > > > is part of
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 15:41 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Currently, we have two machines with alsa drivers (only one of which
> *really* works, but that is beside the point), and the working driver is
> applied to our mips-sources-2.6.* ebuilds along with the patchset for
> octane. However
dont see this as a real reason to not change the default personally.
mips-sources exists in the tree for a reason, and are being actively
maintained. by setting the default virtual for alsa-sound to
gentoo-sources surely wont effect you anyways, considering alsa-drivers
doesn't work, gentoo-sourc
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 14:28 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> The problem is that *all* mips-sources ebuilds do not provide alsa.
> Only the mips-sources-2.6.* versions do this, and then only if
> USE="ip30" (Octane users).
This makes sense, although not the USE flag.
> I'm just worried about f
