On Wednesday 28 September 2005 15:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> | On Wednesday 28 September 2005 13:19, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> | IUSE="baz bop"
> | iuse_expand VIDEO_CARDS foo bar
>
> This has the ring of hack to me, if it's something to be used in ebuilds.
USE_EXPAND was a
Hola.
Subject says it all; SANDBOX_DISABLED functions as (essentially)
RESTRICT="sandbox", except sandbox is left on for pkg_setup .
This is pretty much redundant, considering it's usage. People stick
it in the global scope; if you _must_ turn off the sandbox for a
specific phase, use SANDBOX
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Agreed. It should be syslog-ng. If nobody objects, I'll change it in
base/virtuals.
I'd keep metalog as default OR fix the syslog-ng default configuration.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu
28.9.2005, 2:50:20, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
> I think syslog-ng is a better logger, except the default configuration
> is pretty icky. I would shoot for something better, even if it's in
> /usr/share. I heard hardened's config is quite nice :) At least
> provide an example of a config that so
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd keep metalog as default OR fix the syslog-ng default configuration.
There's nothing wrong with the default configuration. I have intentionally
made it simple so that it is easy to understand and works well for a
desktop system. There are several e
Hi,
to completely apply the portrait screen orientation to my tff display i
usually run a little script (attached) as standart user. Yesterday i
build a hardware display orientation sensor connected via parallel port.
I wrote a little c program for polling the state. This has to be run as
roo
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:57:26AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Agreed. It should be syslog-ng. If nobody objects, I'll change it in
> > base/virtuals.
>
> Objecting, obviously ;)
[...]
> I'd rather see reasons listed as to why syslog-ng is a superior
> default for users who (most likely) do
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:34:22 +0200 wOmbad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| to completely apply the portrait screen orientation to my tff display
| i usually run a little script (attached) as standart user. Yesterday
| i build a hardware display orientation sensor connected via parallel
| port. I wrote
This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
REVIEWED. Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
if there are any packages which your herd would like.
The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds which have been checked for basic
syntax and style issues. It does NO
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:42:09 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| The tree is now utf-8 clean.
...and now it isn't.
app-benchmarks/ltp/ChangeLog
Bad character 0x0a inside UTF-8 sequence (2/4) at line 8 offset 9
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cr
boo.
So, the devs who have confirmed that they are going are:
Definitely both days: tigger, lcars, slarti, cryos, tomk
(Possibly) Wednesday only: strerror, herbs
If you aren't on that list and should be tell me.
I've made a lame rota thing for manning the booth, I've been as fair as
I could. I
wOmbad posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Wed, 28 Sep
2005 19:34:22 +0200:
> Does anybody know how to realize the same task as the script - but from
> a root console?
While Ciaran's correct, this should have been posted to user, here's one
answer: emerge sudo (if necessary), and ru
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:20:21 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| * app-vim or app-dicts for the spell files?
I was persuaded to go with app-vim, since it's more specific.
| * Will there be sufficient interest from other developers to make this
| worthwhile?
Looks like it.
The ecl
Duncan wrote:
> You may also want to look into configuring sudo so certain users may use
FYI, we have Sudo Guide [1] in our documentation.
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/sudo-guide.xml
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Hey, folks.
I'm trying to write an ebuild, not my first, but definitely something
that is relatively new to me.
Anyways, I've got the following URL that pulls down the source package:
http://www.fpdf.org/en/dl.php?v=153?f=tgz
The file that gets downloaded is fpdf153.tgz.
Well, that messed u
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:46:36AM -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> Hey, folks.
>
> I'm trying to write an ebuild, not my first, but definitely something
> that is relatively new to me.
>
> Anyways, I've got the following URL that pulls down the source package:
>
> http://www.fpdf.org/en/dl.ph
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
> REVIEWED. Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
> if there are any packages which your herd would like.
>
> The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds
17 matches
Mail list logo
