Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
I don't recall having kde/gtk crap turned on by default when I first
showed up. Maybe I'm missing something; regardless, the defaults
(which should be minimal from my standpoint) are anything but.
I think you recall wrong, then. The default USE f
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > > Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:01 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> >> I don't recall having kde/gtk crap turned on by default when I first
> >> showed up. Maybe I'm missing something; regardless, the defaults
> >> (which should be minimal from my st
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin S
>>I must say I have been wondering about this for a while too.
>>A solution might be add some sort of flag to packages that are binary,
>>and then let portage install libstdc++ the first time you install this
>>kind of package.
>
> You mean, like have binary packages depend on
> virtual/libstdc++-
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysi
On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Sch
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
since there has been a lot of discussion lately about default use flags,
I looked at the profiles and found the following:
All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if
the package listed with the flag in this file is
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All,
>
> since there has been a lot of discussion lately about default use flags,
> I looked at the profiles and found the following:
>
> All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if
> the package listed with the flag
On Sunday 28 August 2005 03:36 pm, William Hubbs wrote:
> All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if
> the package listed with the flag in this file is installed on the
> system, the flag is automatically turned on. If that's true, why are
> they also listed in defaul
I am writing an ebuild and wishing to use make_desktop_entry
I have two problems with it:
1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than
just laby.desktop
2. the "Comment" in the desktop file says "Comment=Based on the eutils eclass"
1. I am unable to work out at all, exc
On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
> 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than
> just laby.desktop
the name doesnt matter just ignore it
> 2. the "Comment" in the desktop file says "Comment=Based on the eutils
> eclass"
your ebuild is using 'inherit'
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:54:41 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
> > 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than
> > just laby.desktop
>
> the name doesnt matter just ignore it
OK
>
> > 2. the "Comment" in the desktop fil
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11702 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
15 matches
Mail list logo
