Hi,
I got no answer on gentoo-user, so I try again here.
I've seen keywords m68k and ~m68k in several ebuilds and there's also an
m68k profile in the portage tree.
Does this mean I can put gentoo on my old Amiga? Is there a stage file
somewhere which I can test?
And finally: Anything I can do
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 06:32, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2005 9:30 pm, Wesley Leggette wrote:
> > Isn't that sort of like speaking French with English words?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should actually state what I need to do in clear
> terms: I need to turn MyQuiteLongClassOrMethodName
hi all, and thanks for the kind words. :)
-st3vie
On 6/19/05, Andrés Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Walker wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Please give a nice Gentoo-ized welcome to Senno During (st3vie). Senno
> > will be
> > leading the Dutch GWN Translation team (actually he has bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
st3vie wrote:
> hi all, and thanks for the kind words. :)
(use your gentoo email address... thats why its there ;-)
- --
smithj
Gentoo Developer
[ desktop-misc && documentation ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Co
no use gmail its more 1337 ;p
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 14:35, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I don't really understand why you consider pppconfig unpredictable.
> the ebuild displays what languages will be installed.
Because there is no way to foretell what will be installed without actually
initiating an install.
> > >The IUSE thing w
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:28, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 14:35, Alin Nastac wrote:
> > This would be fine as long as LINGUAS do not appear in IUSE. When
> > LINGUAS var is empty, the "equery uses" report would be an abomination .
>
> The whole point is to add this stuff to IUS
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 14:11, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > FRITZCAPI_CARDS FCDSL_CARDS VIDEO_CARDS INPUT_DEVICES LINGUAS
> >
> > Do any of these not follow the same pattern of empty var == all
> > installed? Any objections to making that a requirement for adding a new
> > USE_E
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Does this mean I can put gentoo on my old Amiga?
kind of
> Is there a stage file somewhere which I can test?
not yet ... but you can find binary packages here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/m68k/
> And finally: Anything I can do to help?
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2005 15:02 schrieb ext Mike Frysinger:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Is there a stage file somewhere which I can test?
>
> not yet ... but you can find binary packages here:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/m68k/
Ah yes, I will see if I find s
Hi folks,
I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
There is no obvious way to freeze a P
Andrej Kacian wrote:[Sun Jun 19 2005, 08:19:16PM EDT]
> I've been wondering - is there any eclass for fixing gcc warnings in $SUBJ
> for C/C++ source files?
Please don't do this. You're suggesting adding something to our tree
and ebuilds that will increase build time and hide upstream proble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Any reason why INPUT_DEVICES is needed in USE_EXPAND rather than just as
> local
> USE flags? It's kind of the odd one out among the above.
The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sense as
USE flags, so it
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 21:32 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2005 9:30 pm, Wesley Leggette wrote:
> > Isn't that sort of like speaking French with English words?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should actually state what I need to do in clear terms:
> I need to turn MyQuiteLongClassOrMetho
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
There is no o
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Any reason why INPUT_DEVICES is needed in USE_EXPAND rather than just as local
USE flags? It's kind of the odd one out among the above.
The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sens
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:55 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2005 15:02 schrieb ext Mike Frysinger:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > And finally: Anything I can do to help?
> >
> > try to get a gcc version which doesnt segfault ? :)
>
> Yep, that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sense as
> USE flags, so it should be something else. In this case, that was
> INPUT_DEVICES. We haven't been able to take much advantage of it y
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:48 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> What the tool should basically do is in some way record the full names
> (including namespaces) that were changed, and then at the end change them
> back again.
That was one of the first things that I considered, but how would it know to
Alec Warner wrote:
>> There is no obvious way to freeze a Portage tree (or to design a
>> specific profile) for testing on a golden workstation, to build a set of
>> update packages (ServicePack) and push it to the workstations, or to
>> have centralized accountability of what's installed where. T
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:[Fri Jun 17 2005, 10:05:32AM EDT]
> On Friday 17 June 2005 04:32, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Before working on a solution to the problem, could we get a more
> > complete list of the tools in question? This has come up before but
> > the list seems to always end with "
Azarah wrote:[Sat Jun 18 2005, 07:23:19AM EDT]
> You might however say install all gnuish tools with the 'g' prefix,
> and then install wrapper scripts/stubs into say /usr/bin/gnu/ or
> /bin/gnu/ (with /usr/bin/gnu/find calling gfind, etc), and portage
> just adds this path as the first path to $PA
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 20:42, Aron Griffis wrote:
> In other words, I think you need to do some work in an overlay so that
> you can present a real list of affected ebuilds and utilites, rather
> than stating that you "don't really know"
Well this was just a discussion, no work should really start
Thierry Carrez wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
>deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
>
>As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
>quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
>
>There
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:35:52PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> I don't say that it cannot be done, and I don't ask what's the best way
> to do it. I just ask *if* we should try to provide higher-level tools
> (and/or doc) to help in doing so. It's not obvious (especially for
> non-developers) ho
25 matches
Mail list logo
